Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:27:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:27:15 -0500 Received: from viper.haque.net ([64.0.249.226]:17292 "EHLO mail.haque.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:27:05 -0500 Message-ID: <3AA8DA0C.D4AF7FF5@haque.net> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2001 08:26:36 -0500 From: "Mohammad A. Haque" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-pre3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graham Murray CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Microsoft begining to open source Windows 2000? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Graham Murray wrote: > Does making a patch necessarily require modifying the source code? > Back in my days as a mainframe systems programmer (ICL VME/B), most OS > patches were made to the binary image, either in the file or to the > loaded virtual memory image. Hmm. I guess you have something there. I come from a Mac background and some patches I've seen to 'hack' a feature into one of Apple's drivers has been one that modifies the resource fork of the driver file. The person who made this mod of course didn't have access to the source code. -- ===================================================================== Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/ mhaque@haque.net "Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/ batmanppc@themes.org ===================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/