Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] KVM: Introduce dedicated vCPUs hint KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED
Date:   Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:29:43 +0800
Message-Id: <1518319786-1466-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

This patchset introduces dedicated vCPUs hint KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED, it 
has two users now:

1) Waiman Long mentioned that:

    Generally speaking, unfair lock performs well for VMs with a small
    number of vCPUs. Native qspinlock may perform better than pvqspinlock
    if there is vCPU pinning and there is no vCPU over-commitment.

2) vCPUs are very unlikely to get preempted when they are the only task 
   running on a CPU. PV TLB flush is slower that the native flush in that 
   case.

v2 -> v3:
 * a separate table for CPUID[0x40000001].EDX bits
 * a new kvm_hint_has_feature macro
v1 -> v2:
 * update to KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED

Wanpeng Li (3):
  KVM: Introduce dedicated vCPUs hint KVM_HINTS_DEDICATED
  KVM: X86: Choose qspinlock when dedicated vCPUs available
  KVM: X86: Don't use PV TLB flush with dedicated vCPUs and steal time
    disabled

 Documentation/virtual/kvm/cpuid.txt  | 12 +++++++++++-
 arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_para.h     |  5 +++++
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h  |  5 +++++
 arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_para.h     |  5 +++++
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h      |  6 ++++++
 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h |  8 ++++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c                | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
 include/asm-generic/kvm_para.h       |  5 +++++
 include/linux/kvm_para.h             |  5 +++++
 9 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.4