Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272945AbTG3PM5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:12:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272951AbTG3PM4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:12:56 -0400 Received: from gw-nl5.philips.com ([212.153.235.109]:38058 "EHLO gw-nl5.philips.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272945AbTG3PMU (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:12:20 -0400 Message-ID: <3F27E08F.2020406@basmevissen.nl> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:13:19 +0200 From: Bas Mevissen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anuradha Ratnaweera Cc: LKML Subject: Re: Contributing to the kernel while being employed References: <1059576606.1759.31.camel@anuradha> In-Reply-To: <1059576606.1759.31.camel@anuradha> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 787 Lines: 24 Anuradha Ratnaweera wrote: > > Not always. Some contracts talk about "employement", while others (most > are of this catagory) are about the "employement period". The latter > _does_ include all 24 hours of the day (I have checked it with some > legal folks.) > This sounds very strange to me. Maybe it is usual in some places, but I would think twice before signing such contract. BTW I got a bounce of the direct reply, sent by postmaser@virtusa.com. Did you recieve the direct send? I can send you the bounce if you like. Bas. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/