Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1432700wrg; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:54:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224YAi/PbOuywxo/sRPkdYlrp13vke8Rmq5harksxEGCVk7IhpDvs0SPH4IUb1BYP9s6+uBY X-Received: by 10.98.11.90 with SMTP id t87mr880238pfi.15.1518378896349; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:54:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518378896; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UikpLNU4rp3mVxDFk9h3O0WathDUp9Vv5sxzdntGTKOD0FWz8PD4jEVkelVik9xd1h oDAPrkPpnJJNSP1lJbueaJont0hyMfhCwT/IGBFN9nYTanfnn/qimfSE9YbysJHWVKg6 XIfPjBJYRu00SAj1fx16UofPOTtFV0bp95OQ0zqPa0pwqFImzVFSIqao44nxJmN7yGHb A1W9LIvhhFhMBOdwSc6VDYMoXEGXYM9tZKhwtAj0+lEhLGAGW7On5AqA5y3HpMNovsIx 8hAPCs1XaEE56IwbCZ1Jp8bHYhZ3oIqdus8Zz3mSg6AbSejRgbg+kADtG+Yhk8dnH0ky tBJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:to:in-reply-to:cc:references:message-id :date:subject:mime-version:from:content-transfer-encoding :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=/n/veN2jEjUKLzwbjvaqWlYGOJnaRIJYq9ACXsAMqPQ=; b=FnPvJSqVr/F6gcKRvr+FAstbr77IEH5aOhgfVpozwAO60J+Ls+vGI7adFY8btusxP6 nqYG3ucV7tOjj8pPupFLgJ77DBxDXnrGugoScfKps86H2yU6xBaFumnAJ/Oe9XC6zhtO /8YDp7NoMYS3wf2Pf60c7Iq6jqOrXXUs/X5t0QszPk5iUwM38v+W6MeSywsseif+KNPx h/uxLaoye2xVkl47DIopcCZE9LiirR5ESwqmUgto9Fb1MosE60w2+JjDL5OCGw4w1C2G /MqA8hH24YSnQUjunuQHnpaVLJJgfxo8cdtzcTGR/uxlU8vZiovqNq9xj7LawkStk+KO hy3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amacapital-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=kQR2Bv3/; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s14-v6si2868196plp.604.2018.02.11.11.54.27; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:54:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amacapital-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=kQR2Bv3/; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932160AbeBKTx0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:53:26 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:41599 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932123AbeBKTxW (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:53:22 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f66.google.com with SMTP id t4so5027508pgp.8 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:53:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amacapital-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=/n/veN2jEjUKLzwbjvaqWlYGOJnaRIJYq9ACXsAMqPQ=; b=kQR2Bv3/qLYWXdyME8n6DqcCAUuFEXLKsHsYt92uhxyx2bfzz7SaNi69EjOEd1sM7G YYynR6WbENSTztUU1EuW9tDi5QulPNl8jcxHy4+hDB9rJaZ4PILRwuI9XNodz3Ylacm9 2H6FMbKs10zdycxvHS08b0iLIYYcjLFu5w4tnZqX9qkNiYBpuZLoCSonHzh0inG/1rX3 mdtSxuei0J6tZvUWyhpHiGDCESQRDLoy7CsctGziVD0nbJWzQXoIx4P12Nvq1sf9poI4 mDSfz7OBl1O20d/rvmSv4cl6/GB6+OcwZl90/TtGGX1S/j/FTHD4nvZOnqTNTxUop40W 5LMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=/n/veN2jEjUKLzwbjvaqWlYGOJnaRIJYq9ACXsAMqPQ=; b=Y+JUZ3yUVb11M2yTjCOz+ZjL+Uqyu1kDKlFw9ViBleEmNDmydmja2+gGHM8hKETPgu alpzuzIgw5p7KFht+B+JY6N3gQ9cafrlCGygVAC1i5wRG30iYCcpVuh513liBNbWeZLk UaBIFGafuvUjmrWK2zDyezlHSPnNQmlRBzAZkkGuMLeKOgvdjFRu1VpTz5KH462QxE9w 4QuxStoYtieX/sPxsWFBGzvFFwSvT46bBK6fsun5+y0/H8hecNdKxtwutfVgSEbYyylc EJE3c3u1Y8LQruT+F5aliRqecEdIwV0bxkoaTztOsrgmXVNwRxJrpLgh8Uc7Gh9vCXRL Vxcw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBATaIO2M6WLz2B1Iy2n4y1lU3/1iARs7KnfPAyg9tgfdfKCV8+ woks4V7Ax8i/u6E3Or+fk5UE6Q== X-Received: by 10.98.57.131 with SMTP id u3mr9399113pfj.237.1518378801839; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:53:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.231.198.85] (108.sub-97-41-129.myvzw.com. [97.41.129.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm18956846pgn.9.2018.02.11.11.45.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:53:21 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Andy Lutomirski Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31 v2] PTI support for x86_32 Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 11:42:47 -0800 Message-Id: <0C6EFF56-F135-480C-867C-B117F114A99F@amacapital.net> References: <1518168340-9392-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> <20180209191112.55zyjf4njum75brd@suse.de> <20180210091543.ynypx4y3koz44g7y@angband.pl> <20180211105909.53bv5q363u7jgrsc@angband.pl> <6FB16384-7597-474E-91A1-1AF09201CEAC@gmail.com> Cc: Adam Borowski , Linus Torvalds , Joerg Roedel , Andy Lutomirski , Joerg Roedel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , X86 ML , LKML , Linux-MM , Dave Hansen , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Jiri Kosina , Boris Ostrovsky , Brian Gerst , David Laight , Denys Vlasenko , Eduardo Valentin , Greg KH , Will Deacon , "Liguori, Anthony" , Daniel Gruss , Hugh Dickins , Kees Cook , Andrea Arcangeli , Waiman Long , Pavel Machek In-Reply-To: <6FB16384-7597-474E-91A1-1AF09201CEAC@gmail.com> To: Mark D Rustad X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15D60) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Feb 11, 2018, at 9:40 AM, Mark D Rustad wrote: >> On Feb 11, 2018, at 2:59 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: >>=20 >>> Does Debian make it easy to upgrade to a 64-bit kernel if you have a >>> 32-bit install? >>=20 >> Quite easy, yeah. Crossgrading userspace is not for the faint of the hea= rt, >> but changing just the kernel is fine. >=20 > ISTR that iscsi doesn't work when running a 64-bit kernel with a 32-bit us= erspace. I remember someone offered kernel patches to fix it, but I think th= ey were rejected. I haven't messed with that stuff in many years, so perhaps= the userspace side now has accommodation for it. It might be something to c= heck on. >=20 At the risk of suggesting heresy, should we consider removing x86_32 support= at some point?=