Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1522061wrg; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:13:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227pHJLHBITovcohiheUm2ZSNU6CUa1ZavcA5nCIhD4E3zGAl8GR62ep7tLnzW7UtyhciEJw X-Received: by 10.101.69.141 with SMTP id o13mr7596661pgq.394.1518387219477; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:13:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518387219; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KAgoo+IxZH5TIKDqnHWCzZICLtEPWFp8T6c+5eRati+Hs9Mz3P+x2NEKvEsvy8go/Z /3lvWeUYmEpSwJ6xWE89n1MD9SynUtAQpogNI7TDVWhd0C3DP6d+au5pH89FIKLZtkZE zDx5Upv4B8yJ8QXzB6WjlCjp+B0N1QTfmJ1xucFmJr8GNFNr772RkGt1fywCTAMY7733 30XN68l9XJNksUSPGmZvSQZXWEgO6KOQudHUhLHNmb1nt0DyXzv8u6Om0FVVIRHpINC0 NpFGiJjqEaf8bJpzO1+frUX2InCdwSZAmMjCqIn6VBu9y1aAjlgjuiI/D/pw3HnmuNC0 ou/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id :dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=dBKEizNKPrxb8y62y7/OWynKpgQZ/inRBEp+HotNpAo=; b=ht7cv5QYGhjFnN/Fto/rYL9fMd1wtyfn4EwhTJsUkkeK/3K0Ljkmh45VMkLxQqJosB ObJ0nudd99A985e0IsdyzQnGAV908l3j8+zH59+ksC1a0AF7u6UQ3nzrIZhoj4fG2dtO maTkGrL4z8Kyj3PRTEn4l7tV/qTpcEG+7o20YSI2EeH2c+qQXNaahdTuByl6NWIosM2y mVs7Cp9E4risQ2jz1RbuBgp3zXmOcp1rgMm3mqAMmlWCjCjX7HmRxv6/VBqfHuyLa2ni +ld3fgUNvxe5eIYE7QTC0SQuq7uMDgz5+tx5ExeqY9UAaeizHNdGs0Le4ca5jjwERVwl cN2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.s=20151216 header.b=hXCL6kBA; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hansenpartnership.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 64-v6si4958960plk.313.2018.02.11.14.13.23; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:13:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@hansenpartnership.com header.s=20151216 header.b=hXCL6kBA; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=hansenpartnership.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932180AbeBKWMq (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 11 Feb 2018 17:12:46 -0500 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:45760 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932127AbeBKWMo (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2018 17:12:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D4E8EE14D; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:12:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f_sh5Z9x4GaS; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:12:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from [153.66.254.194] (unknown [50.35.65.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1F7B8EE0FC; Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:12:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1518387162; bh=lqnQtrvT1WA8R30PaEmF7i0ZjU8roKvxGomn62P2I+w=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hXCL6kBAOX0v3v+djuh01kLsCOTyBVxGaHZC+0GNfiDwA837C5f5QfkV3tuifTafo daqOM/OAv803Qr/uSVbIvAyax6ILmhRflB1ftga6TgSXYXHRFFAn5LCAvfS/Ts7479 Lnp/sLOsFXO/NhHJ5HZl2hUFPiF4pmdmlvpOavOU= Message-ID: <1518387160.3979.10.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31 v2] PTI support for x86_32 From: James Bottomley To: Andy Lutomirski , Mark D Rustad Cc: Adam Borowski , Linus Torvalds , Joerg Roedel , Andy Lutomirski , Joerg Roedel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , X86 ML , LKML , Linux-MM , Dave Hansen , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , Jiri Kosina , Boris Ostrovsky , Brian Gerst , David Laight , Denys Vlasenko , Eduardo Valentin , Greg KH , Will Deacon , "Liguori, Anthony" , Daniel Gruss , Hugh Dickins , Kees Cook , Andrea Arcangeli , Waiman Long , Pavel Machek Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 14:12:40 -0800 In-Reply-To: <0C6EFF56-F135-480C-867C-B117F114A99F@amacapital.net> References: <1518168340-9392-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org> <20180209191112.55zyjf4njum75brd@suse.de> <20180210091543.ynypx4y3koz44g7y@angband.pl> <20180211105909.53bv5q363u7jgrsc@angband.pl> <6FB16384-7597-474E-91A1-1AF09201CEAC@gmail.com> <0C6EFF56-F135-480C-867C-B117F114A99F@amacapital.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2018-02-11 at 11:42 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2018, at 9:40 AM, Mark D Rustad wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Feb 11, 2018, at 2:59 AM, Adam Borowski > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Does Debian make it easy to upgrade to a 64-bit kernel if you > > > > have a > > > > 32-bit install? > > > > > > Quite easy, yeah.  Crossgrading userspace is not for the faint of > > > the heart, > > > but changing just the kernel is fine. > > > > ISTR that iscsi doesn't work when running a 64-bit kernel with a > > 32-bit userspace. I remember someone offered kernel patches to fix > > it, but I think they were rejected. I haven't messed with that > > stuff in many years, so perhaps the userspace side now has > > accommodation for it. It might be something to check on. > > > > At the risk of suggesting heresy, should we consider removing x86_32 > support at some point? Hey, my cloud server is 32 bit: bedivere:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo  processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 15 model : 2 model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz stepping : 9 microcode : 0x2e cpu MHz : 2813.464 [...] I suspect a lot of people are in the same position: grandfathered in on an old hosting plan, but not really willing to switch to a new 64 bit box because the monthly cost about doubles and nothing it does is currently anywhere up to (let alone over) the capacity of the single 686 processor. The thing which is making me consider it is actually getting a TPM to protect the private keys, but doubling the monthly cost is still a huge disincentive. James