Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp2011521wrg; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 02:46:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225twQAcTOVn/17gjeA8YSN/VGjklmCGAC1422rDCrOgzhpWOKMjAu041e5GKy5N/3XC01gz X-Received: by 10.99.167.75 with SMTP id w11mr9320004pgo.246.1518432414465; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 02:46:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518432414; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dZc89mYrBnL2IxYmF0EiKKthKzGidsANVgYbwLZqzx9fQnCJfN79XZQYsag6hQdDFU AFzwBRMn6u/jzTVdMrhm85UtUZNHZNVwdSfVRUuoQ1ZOZxxe/eJGkWZdxebjluEMv/BA 276/Co+vqE3u8UnkIc080+oHvgE8QrIGxNoUct3gtrpf6kP/y3d2RhFpKg5XJzmVYlQI JQ5JpB8gM8EQyWotiq/nOlZmm7dBy1r96Wg2zh1jrpnUTPiPNcUlT/VpBRlSIAcrXwrs uanfavjVaEdNZ/beuaEsNSqNsJakzClqwUdsT7W/iuUsfSUMhXny0FJohjFhAxyWjI6X 88KQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:from:cc:references:to :subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=xYBlcb3W2qedvsedmGNcHQ2k0ZZS2v9ddetxf36nWxk=; b=W4TRQpPqoMOVSoJI9Fbs75thY4906M22ysysRDK6JOV+A+3AeLW5i1LgCoXcF/+KvV FJqIm2xjH+SBWdpINmTZEIXuMkPyRfaFUYirKQwyeHQz9jfOD/8q9Cm7IDZlFatEI1l/ rJx0nIUZuQ6EvrSggKtMA+Usp2BU4khnIUyOr12CkuxZejVhuCGgQJfSVNaXwYwDgYzU XIEcQEnqwVdJYji13xqUvaFOBpXM67ElQy3zNmWNhEE9nOTU5fCglu1vLPHJV7kFvNk9 wgWXSWyLKdXnLPXCebqHg4br/mobUloxQNQG5/SDtaoHshHzbxrjQyHlbHuv210UGw2U VVhQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 61-v6si772993plq.737.2018.02.12.02.46.38; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 02:46:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933648AbeBLKdx (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 05:33:53 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:39218 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932558AbeBLKdw (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 05:33:52 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1CATWPq118641 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 05:33:51 -0500 Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2g397h85pn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 05:33:51 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:33:50 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.140) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:33:46 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w1CAXjF144695802; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:33:45 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5850F11C054; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:27:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C2D11C04C; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:26:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc4502181600.ibm.com (unknown [9.84.225.146]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:26:58 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Check negative value returned by cpufreq_table_find_index_dl() To: Viresh Kumar References: <1518430876-24464-1-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180212102900.GU28462@vireshk-i7> Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au From: Shilpasri G Bhat Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:03:42 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180212102900.GU28462@vireshk-i7> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18021210-0040-0000-0000-0000040ECDD4 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18021210-0041-0000-0000-000026128C05 Message-Id: <14e2fe70-7628-4377-664d-3c4b0071e08d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-02-12_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1802120136 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 02/12/2018 03:59 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12-02-18, 15:51, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote: >> This patch fixes the below Coverity warning: >> >> *** CID 182816: Memory - illegal accesses (NEGATIVE_RETURNS) >> /drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c: 1008 in powernv_fast_switch() >> 1002 unsigned int target_freq) >> 1003 { >> 1004 int index; >> 1005 struct powernv_smp_call_data freq_data; >> 1006 >> 1007 index = cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(policy, target_freq); >>>>> CID 182816: Memory - illegal accesses (NEGATIVE_RETURNS) >>>>> Using variable "index" as an index to array "powernv_freqs". >> 1008 freq_data.pstate_id = powernv_freqs[index].driver_data; >> 1009 freq_data.gpstate_id = powernv_freqs[index].driver_data; >> 1010 set_pstate(&freq_data); >> 1011 >> 1012 return powernv_freqs[index].frequency; >> 1013 } >> >> Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c >> index 29cdec1..69edfe9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c >> @@ -1005,6 +1005,9 @@ static unsigned int powernv_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, >> struct powernv_smp_call_data freq_data; >> >> index = cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(policy, target_freq); >> + if (unlikely(index < 0)) >> + index = get_nominal_index(); >> + > > AFAICT, you will get -1 here only if the freq table had no valid > frequencies (or the freq table is empty). Why would that happen ? I agree too. There is no way we can get -1 with initialized cpu frequency table. We don't initialize powernv-cpufreq if we don't have valid CPU frequency entries. Is there any other way to suppress the Coverity tool warning apart from ignoring it? Thanks and Regards, Shilpa > >> freq_data.pstate_id = powernv_freqs[index].driver_data; >> freq_data.gpstate_id = powernv_freqs[index].driver_data; >> set_pstate(&freq_data); >> -- >> 1.8.3.1 >