Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S273257AbTG3SuS (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:50:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S273259AbTG3SuS (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:50:18 -0400 Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:17567 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S273257AbTG3SuH (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:50:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:50:02 +0200 From: Marc Giger To: Pavel Machek Cc: John Bradford , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pgw99@doc.ic.ac.uk Subject: Re: PATCH : LEDs - possibly the most pointless kernel subsystem ever Message-Id: <20030730205002.1e2a27bf.gigerstyle@gmx.ch> In-Reply-To: <20030730174457.GI10276@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <200307301608.h6UG8YQJ000339@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> <20030730174457.GI10276@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2184 Lines: 56 Hi All, On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 19:44:57 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > But this kind of blinkenlights needed pretty fast LEDs. (At 486 > > > time I decided that parport on ISA is fast enough..) > > > > I'll buy some LEDs and build a parallel port connected LED panel > > tomorrow... Do you think the overhead of driving the LEDs would > > have too much of a negative effect on system performance? If so, or > > if we Yesterday I connected 8 LED's to the parallelport datalines. Today I read this thread. What for a coincidence... The goal of this "project" was to show the current cpu load. It works great now! I can see randomly the LED's lightening up while I am writing this mail:-)) > > I'm not sure. At 486 days I was pretty sure it did not matter. These > days you might get 10% slowdown on some microbenchmark, or something > like that. I do not think it can slow down common tasks. > > My construction of LED lights is extremely flaky, and I'm afraid of > burning printer port. At 486 days ports were expected to survive such > abuse. Not sure if todays EPP/wtf ports can handle that. > Pavel At beginning I had some fear to connect LEDS directly to the parport, because its an onboard controller (like the most mainboards have). I don't notice system performance slowdowns. (CPU Load code was borrowed from xosview:-)) My personal goal would be to controll a Dot-Matrix Display. The Display should show something like the actual CPU temperature, CPU-load, processes, s.m.a.r.t state, etc etc etc etc..........But my problem is how to beginn with that. I would prefer to controll it with a PCI card. Also I looked today at 68HC11 microcontrollers, which I can connect to the serial port and transmit the needed infos. Are there suggestions / comments / questions? If somebody is interested to develop such a card / controller with me, I will be pleased to hear from you! Thank you Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/