Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp2518213wrg; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:51:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225a+d3V+IhNkK40h9zi+kuuEPJvbhrtOXuwgc2GunII3sXPUJOBA9495ObTSoh7rA8VAF0A X-Received: by 10.98.249.68 with SMTP id g4mr2812514pfm.81.1518461480907; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:51:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518461480; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=X4IBeMpbTuGJTxAsRB0+otsTm9GL11CBRiW2fTAiRM9r1FtGhCKiYMcMdoZOHRZC/q nMPbsSEVp8cyVEvETsvmRBXGLcLv+gPR/k8lUBKO/GCm3oPOPmjNekTiK7u9mySmnSOB hFOn1Wo5F5G8gHE7AEq2QEijr/9JH/KOlvhLl7pWLzc3zm+95lhRM9/USDcpnNdUDKLf gmq7dBt/BHldkO70XLPUHHlS0nI9wwzIb148D1Dk7uoA75A6vssM++L7BiT4ntgSPE1d R0XZrg2Or0k6xaXQd89l/Nznw6MO9bTQHtVB6ha6eJR4KrUPhv3BTJiFl7GZ5oaKcZCZ 59Ig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=CsrEWVgEUhhJgU40rXv8P5u1lcGWdHKSRDHyrDyeuMg=; b=QzuG0CkrqzqAp8zNJ6/71Bs6YqZkeQDVUpSXWcBYV4X8f+2U0Pkxpy8FwzGQzF3u12 S/z2kQk0xiEKNQOuhPFpwAyIuee35JDuju0I9Q/aroya6SAEtgar96OT/1QQ7iASRZUT YncQ3QxgoP/g0m8mIrMWxXoYkzJxDs/1GIwnWVP2nD2O7zauKJ/cu64l+ylrsWXhanis vVfiHSJGchluTYOUk4GfbohnR0fNfTELQpFgJSNPP1iLpLU9x5I9l0+i7WZEqcKzDuG1 xb2xhtrycYPRuzhRzNNUp49p+8+gWfOzBVv/x4tzUy6VXZBVPI8xOka3YWoNJ8FGpG49 El1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k189si5421380pgc.505.2018.02.12.10.51.06; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:51:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754099AbeBLSqF (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:46:05 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:47224 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754052AbeBLSqA (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:46:00 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA0B165D; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:46:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.210.28]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BDF433F24D; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:45:58 -0800 (PST) From: Sudeep Holla To: ALKML , LKML , DTML Cc: Sudeep Holla , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Arnd Bergmann , Alexey Klimov Subject: [PATCH v5 11/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add support for polling based SCMI transfers Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:45:15 +0000 Message-Id: <1518461124-17371-12-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1518461124-17371-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <1518461124-17371-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It would be useful to have options to perform some SCMI transfers atomically by polling for the completion flag instead of interrupt driven. The SCMI specification has option to disable the interrupt and poll for the completion flag in the shared memory. This patch adds support for polling based SCMI transfers using that option. This might be used for uninterrupted/atomic DVFS operations from the scheduler context. Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c index 939ef626bfdd..0108bb39d0f6 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c @@ -26,9 +26,11 @@ */ #include +#include #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -346,6 +348,21 @@ void scmi_one_xfer_put(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags); } +static bool +scmi_xfer_poll_done(const struct scmi_info *info, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) +{ + struct scmi_shared_mem *mem = info->tx_payload; + u16 xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(le32_to_cpu(mem->msg_header)); + + if (xfer->hdr.seq != xfer_id) + return false; + + return le32_to_cpu(mem->channel_status) & + (SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_ERROR | + SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_FREE); +} + +#define SCMI_MAX_POLLING_TIMEOUT_NS (100 * NSEC_PER_USEC) /** * scmi_do_xfer() - Do one transfer * @@ -372,14 +389,30 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) /* mbox_send_message returns non-negative value on success, so reset */ ret = 0; - /* And we wait for the response. */ - timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(info->desc->max_rx_timeout_ms); - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&xfer->done, timeout)) { - dev_err(dev, "mbox timed out in resp(caller: %pF)\n", - (void *)_RET_IP_); - ret = -ETIMEDOUT; - } else if (xfer->hdr.status) { - ret = scmi_to_linux_errno(xfer->hdr.status); + if (xfer->hdr.poll_completion) { + ktime_t stop, cur; + + stop = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), SCMI_MAX_POLLING_TIMEOUT_NS); + do { + udelay(5); + cur = ktime_get(); + } while (!scmi_xfer_poll_done(info, xfer) && + ktime_before(cur, stop)); + + if (ktime_before(cur, stop)) + scmi_fetch_response(xfer, info->tx_payload); + else + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + } else { + /* And we wait for the response. */ + timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(info->desc->max_rx_timeout_ms); + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&xfer->done, timeout)) { + dev_err(dev, "mbox timed out in resp(caller: %pF)\n", + (void *)_RET_IP_); + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + } else if (xfer->hdr.status) { + ret = scmi_to_linux_errno(xfer->hdr.status); + } } /* * NOTE: we might prefer not to need the mailbox ticker to manage the -- 2.7.4