Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp2759322wrg; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:27:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227xRLHy3ot1HfmHYNYHyDt3rC1jrimHzz8zohJ6KzAdABklnUhGLsPVCJ0BOaYkuNYyeBOr X-Received: by 10.99.148.17 with SMTP id m17mr10487807pge.367.1518478050210; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:27:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518478050; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UfVNtiJMzJ4U7w+8zbfSy3Qz4cnn+ZDJh7H1BB9KyXyrnpp95mVGd38fWIps2ucySQ EvtN/r0CePH3cficbN+1zv92p8Ko2rJnMvT3w8D5JgV44rGhvo1KV+HNtIgF3CkBhTRk gM6asee/S5tPWwAk1RHTOV+suTm/VGkK0CLAfNaxSJvUXUlm+s3iqtaBopZAtjOX2PDS JtN7jbCDpBi3Mfyz3DSDzWaAIiHOnEy5LBcN/TvoS8bD9SV31gJmsVN/YZFnpk/bvGju 2msrt6W/cSGqW6fdZ2dLnt2f4GfP9lqulzAzrM5DbmDll+0Shz8TPF+793drEl4wbSuP zvPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=jAbcoqRfjS+769rohlIHZg0EXb9HdpkIaRuCEd4v08Y=; b=GWAIW07nqW0Q45sURdya6bGIVTCGLhBrrOXMM8K6UCtV+rXFWiaBl3CDHAfIH8mRPF 4gWnHKFODDT54sUvZi0y2oMGXso9AZ70q7/TrLP3fEF+brQZlgdx83K9WSfVt0h6HeX0 bwoeSm1gToBp1fpyp6kOvk+Lj7eCLCas9Y0QVLtKYMC2ptMQadsj8qcDFgapHLhS7L0n g8fTuSom3S95pnpTPi4qRz/HIYve/cnjv5BVLK3afc1haANX1UNj/exIgKsuZVjkMW3o BHtqVQJwB3dTV2nuTdHjXYaG7vHEMNqXCNcf2056W9BqmoVvERe+coW0ATPD7U7cujMP 2Wkw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=h3vAt8qh; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 1-v6si388902plb.601.2018.02.12.15.27.15; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:27:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=h3vAt8qh; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932637AbeBLXZz (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:25:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pl0-f65.google.com ([209.85.160.65]:44970 "EHLO mail-pl0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932272AbeBLXZy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:25:54 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-f65.google.com with SMTP id f8so5719195plk.11 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:25:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jAbcoqRfjS+769rohlIHZg0EXb9HdpkIaRuCEd4v08Y=; b=h3vAt8qh1LSw2YuXs0HdC5uTRaNGXcTt928ojrwd05Z2//Yb7Z05bzXNZFfrWqeFbz mS13RXEbzrtl9L7ilE11rdL1zZWiDdDuCaTRNTfzbe1sACrKaGD3iAf/Cg7qV3WBtKQU 9ud17hg4pyNcje5ADWoZyfBODbHCUyBsnMi0YgjDcI1YkBvw/iUHtlCAKlUl/t/QSAXM jFO3GFIDi9MRt8QhF1R/E26AGG1X1jb5dImmZp4GxJYPo3xraGtnUYYMLR20rp7oU7Ja yxXk3kNG5G/eg8ZFcBMnMnnZCpRlSi6821l4uYTVdvav/oQ77tqCstDFHyTny+Sb4R4L JU+A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jAbcoqRfjS+769rohlIHZg0EXb9HdpkIaRuCEd4v08Y=; b=JdJogghNfJza/loiQlJqX6z7dR6ZJ6sYlVCN8CQguEnt0LJWxiIDlWXQqJnZIAAJuj INOSN0EnzsX9nLX0ggk9PF5VO73Jhxd+1HkxJOCFqdzMx3OVahyqpgWZiPG1yZ7nK12M v+a5UPgpheHQwB9xSGl5WajHKNPqjCg6GFHWTRS3Vnw2Bumg5aq5dADrTLA+g0b1Mnoo llCUETHlh/SH60DuJKYholBDCYtuW9Lb6iN2ZNAUZdfSFZ+2bXMsWTVuIcZkJYkdqlMp u8zCUfBqbfywpZZlRonL5eciDfHtDMzOBRrrKzuVyOzGWrwtUxnwrBo2wH4nXi65Esod SJhg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBYeChHS8fXtfByNP836I55C/sCNalWbF8Pg3Ehl5cBPtzWLn3W yywi7gqYGrz+pOQh/YPs9ug= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7f0b:: with SMTP id d11-v6mr12375329plm.350.1518477953503; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:25:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (108-223-40-66.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.223.40.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n27sm30391801pfb.63.2018.02.12.15.25.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:25:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 15:25:51 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Balbir Singh Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , "open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/kdump: Add missing optional dummy functions Message-ID: <20180212232551.GA5199@roeck-us.net> References: <1518474848-3158-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:01:57AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > If KEXEC_CORE is not enabled, PowerNV builds fail as follows. > > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c: In function 'pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self': > > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c:236:4: error: > > implicit declaration of function 'crash_ipi_callback' > > > > Add dummy function calls, similar to kdump_in_progress(), to solve the > > problem. > > > > Fixes: 4145f358644b ("powernv/kdump: Fix cases where the kdump kernel ...") > > Cc: Balbir Singh > > Cc: Michael Ellerman > > Cc: Nicholas Piggin > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck > > --- > > Thanks for working on this. > > You've added two functions, I understand the crash_send_ipi() bits > that I broke. Looks like crash_ipi_callback broken without KEXEC_CORE? > If I recall correctly, 4145f358644b introduced the call to crash_ipi_callback(). After I declared the dummy function for that, I got an error about the missing crash_send_ipi(). I didn't spend more time on it but just added another dummy function. It may well be that another problem was introduced in the same time frame. On the other side, maybe I got it all wrong, and my patch is not worth the computer it was written on. Thanks, Guenter