Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:38:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:38:09 -0500 Received: from vp175062.reshsg.uci.edu ([128.195.175.62]:65287 "EHLO moisil.dev.hydraweb.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 11:37:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:35:48 -0800 Message-Id: <200103091635.f29GZmC19160@moisil.dev.hydraweb.com> From: Ion Badulescu To: Andrew Morton Cc: lkml , Alan Cox , Ingo Molnar , Keith Owens Subject: Re: [patch] serial console vs NMI watchdog In-Reply-To: <3AA8E6E5.A4AD5035@uow.edu.au> User-Agent: tin/1.5.7-20001104 ("Paradise Regained") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.18 (i586)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 01:21:25 +1100, Andrew Morton wrote: > +/** > + * enable_nmi_watchdog - enables/disables NMI watchdog checking. > + * @yes: If zero, disable Ugh. I have a feeling that your chances to get Linus to accept this are extremely slim. Just have two functions, enable_nmi_watchdog and disable_nmi_watchdog. You can make them inline, or even macros... Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/