Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180213130550.Horde.JMezTfF5lIykmPMB49PKEwG@gator4166.hostgator.com>
References: <20180213165948.GA14035@embeddedor.com> <CAHp75VfdDUooc=zy2rk8ep0PdsEsD1TGbaD9nm8DBB1NmYYTTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180213130550.Horde.JMezTfF5lIykmPMB49PKEwG@gator4166.hostgator.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:26:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf2MF0cxyi+g99WUMViWGGq6B_S6nKPPfpaYWL5SvizKw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/ASPM: Use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:05 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
<garsilva@embeddedor.com> wrote:

> It seems to me that it makes no sense for threshold_ns to be of type u64,
> because the expression threshold_us * 1000 will never exceed the 32-bit
> limits. So if you agree I can send a patch to change its type to u32
> instead.

Whatever Bjorn prefers.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko