Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp4111603wrg; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:00:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226TaJRXBQl3T5sRreGb4NvjKX0CPteLo0Vq1EeNifi54V1NXEEwFySXxoAYPS6jgkh5v32J X-Received: by 10.99.127.86 with SMTP id p22mr1956626pgn.157.1518555609920; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:00:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518555609; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=iBVWYald7Yt3QM2CI6ZgEYkVPzd/OXwYqmsliaFvV2Uj65HiqN5T+XvgYo/VUc6Qhh 9gzeiQJGn1U2zJjb8ou2rVSCFdoadXgEeKDaSU0Jv6musmSutg16PogZwjEnmrUiIRvF 452tf9bxqj9ZUdOk6mgJphhTcCRbkKtUlFzPVyX9yol6YQt0CNLam2WFoGxq+jzdYOfA 1LBV2JbocWzHbG6aX/bX2stFoTM/xwOHRR/XKcSazn/tPhzxUdp6pgupy3p6Cwcls3hy keWjr4q2peRaNozEwpR9WCkcxjosV8bEN46JQXZL2rQ4Ufjy5TP52CS+xLuoMKXkfUi+ KKeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=2swaHi9O9MILwwRZvUt4zycrkNgY92/clvnO3sNt4T0=; b=eoN53VyI6N3PRLER+ijYqo+Voeh1iq5wG2uUXPAfW6N7tTLLM3DGE+w4nfjMn+rhpz 5dmg3QDfVp487zLMDkFuaPoLPd+k+WvkNnG7gZcM1VZETkW609/qPwFLZDE+MqzZYouB YmNB79hqS2IKWUbs4zJjWWKRdUblKCe4ALcCO4ANiu8dl2YR2ujoij9ED6nIgkpz4tTp aAJK0vUccJgHY4r9WPhLN8xLSfMWCFCVDI72Wb5JrUCNhyjq7DX5VQCCvDfZlGG/Ahiu h4eFZDuKmVG84IQWeioNFeKY360osMqwbfs5QRzyJMm/4EUJ4I6PFxQd+lT6EGfv5V5E JJJg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e1-v6si2136152plj.600.2018.02.13.12.59.53; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:00:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965825AbeBMU7H (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:59:07 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:43608 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965676AbeBMU7G (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:59:06 -0500 Received: by atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz (Postfix, from userid 512) id 2ADE780167; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:59:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 21:59:00 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Hans Verkuil Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] platform: vivid-cec: use 64-bit arithmetic instead of 32-bit Message-ID: <20180213205900.GB6185@amd> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon 2018-02-05 22:29:41, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 02/05/2018 09:36 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > Add suffix ULL to constant 10 in order to give the compiler complete > > information about the proper arithmetic to use. Notice that this > > constant is used in a context that expects an expression of type > > u64 (64 bits, unsigned). > >=20 > > The expression len * 10 * CEC_TIM_DATA_BIT_TOTAL is currently being > > evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic. > >=20 > > Also, remove unnecessary parentheses and add a code comment to make it > > clear what is the reason of the code change. > >=20 > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1454996 > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - Update subject and changelog to better reflect the proposed code cha= nges. > > - Add suffix ULL to constant instead of casting a variable. > > - Remove unncessary parentheses. >=20 > unncessary -> unnecessary >=20 > > - Add code comment. > >=20 > > drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c | 11 +++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >=20 > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c b/drivers/media/p= latform/vivid/vivid-cec.c > > index b55d278..614787b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vivid/vivid-cec.c > > @@ -82,8 +82,15 @@ static void vivid_cec_pin_adap_events(struct cec_ada= pter *adap, ktime_t ts, > > =20 > > if (adap =3D=3D NULL) > > return; > > - ts =3D ktime_sub_us(ts, (CEC_TIM_START_BIT_TOTAL + > > - len * 10 * CEC_TIM_DATA_BIT_TOTAL)); > > + > > + /* > > + * Suffix ULL on constant 10 makes the expression > > + * CEC_TIM_START_BIT_TOTAL + 10ULL * len * CEC_TIM_DATA_BIT_TOTAL > > + * be evaluated using 64-bit unsigned arithmetic (u64), which > > + * is what ktime_sub_us expects as second argument. > > + */ >=20 > That's not really the comment that I was looking for. It still doesn't > explain *why* this is needed at all. How about something like this: >=20 > /* > * Add the ULL suffix to the constant 10 to work around a false Coverity > * "Unintentional integer overflow" warning. Coverity isn't smart enough > * to understand that len is always <=3D 16, so there is no chance of an > * integer overflow. > */ Or maybe it would be better to add comment about Coverity having false-positive and not to modify the code? Hmm. Could we do something like BUG_ON(len > 16) to make Coverity understand the ranges? Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlqDUZQACgkQMOfwapXb+vJPCACffW74HBAdGlWkCS5bplte9NVo e1wAn3KhUE81CDM5QDwzULA1mkqj9/Wf =aAcH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WYTEVAkct0FjGQmd--