Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp27456wrg; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:54:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226rIcBvSkvtELwqpN0rQNZqbCglaAcV0VDF15Fib5zSmGGR5afxQzmKwr0rVSqU7wELoG5p X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:274a:: with SMTP id j10-v6mr2585041plg.107.1518566072843; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:54:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518566072; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NsYGJ3T8nhq+F9eU6aa/fycIwXYYBuxKdM9XkiUV2AWq14K8W4NNJuxOEjOYisVlE5 Lz8rB0ZqNGHhoHP72+721MLQRp+Qx/reGl5GJ9Jk2fyhE3vR1WRzT737VgCBKAjBYjma svk27fudpEYSu6RHavdjQQnXi6IlKycM5m4OULMLF0qcG8shhlxXt5txpKJmrHm1fyf2 ixo/QJT3hrgymIA+oUX/pRe23tK4P/RM4m8UfJDZ2CaycPKHN7ZKqW+bUUJtTi1p1bPo jUnQ/ltBjb5dw1V2P7lhmecBuZfTjJGvIkH6FbH1MWGAvcANY0iVWDnsDU0usXO6g84b fFUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=vNXmgE4z3CZVcra3N6nyy9Myvp1IEIt5PNRfumWx/90=; b=BIlL1tmRxJKKCl74j6u0p0xm/e3XNNZOj0DVvn/IINMAuF8Ck9ajBjj94P0VahPrCp hNMPsGa/JmVHiw3nlQBs0G1stei+60waQIAl7fJ1bJg3gNOpKLRezlmCOHSXb8wAy6NT kssqd8SAHqySA8MJuTidxPIW5Klzju5pXilzHojBNag2VJ0EFCMCI5IVHI0w+7rB1pHT wE/C0cGO/Slz3Qlt7fss7IUn+UzzwDQdKhRN8LFHiyHXcqVRig2AXagRs2G6JntrghFr OGozTV0z14gbgSlpsNBR1gkT8+y8J2in4u7x69F+A2/+3qWEh0GQsqwNzaK02VWYI9nb jKdQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u15-v6si59894plk.130.2018.02.13.15.54.18; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:54:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966339AbeBMXwo (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:52:44 -0500 Received: from mga17.intel.com ([192.55.52.151]:53394 "EHLO mga17.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966195AbeBMXtf (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:49:35 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Feb 2018 15:49:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,509,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="29822323" Received: from rchatre-s.jf.intel.com ([10.54.70.76]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Feb 2018 15:49:34 -0800 From: Reinette Chatre To: tglx@linutronix.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com Cc: gavin.hindman@intel.com, vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre Subject: [RFC PATCH V2 09/22] x86/intel_rdt: Discover supported platforms via prefetch disable bits Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 07:46:53 -0800 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.6 In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Knowing the model specific prefetch disable bits is required to support cache pseudo-locking because the hardware prefetchers need to be disabled when the kernel memory is pseudo-locked to cache. We add these bits only for platforms known to support cache pseudo-locking. If we have not validated pseudo-locking on a platform that does support RDT/CAT this should not be seen as a failure of CAT, the pseudo-locking interface will just not be set up. Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c index 94bd1b4fbfee..a0c144b5b09b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_rdt_pseudo_lock.c @@ -24,8 +24,22 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "intel_rdt.h" +/* + * MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL register enables the modification of hardware + * prefetcher state. Details about this register can be found in the MSR + * tables for specific platforms found in Intel's SDM. + */ +#define MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL 0x000001a4 + +/* + * The bits needed to disable hardware prefetching varies based on the + * platform. During initialization we will discover which bits to use. + */ +static u64 prefetch_disable_bits; + struct kernfs_node *pseudo_lock_kn; /* @@ -358,6 +372,57 @@ int rdt_pseudo_lock_rmdir(struct kernfs_node *kn) } /** + * get_prefetch_disable_bits - prefetch disable bits of supported platforms + * + * Here we capture the list of platforms that have been validated to support + * pseudo-locking. This includes testing to ensure pseudo-locked regions + * with low cache miss rates can be created under variety of load conditions + * as well as that these pseudo-locked regions can maintain their low cache + * miss rates under variety of load conditions for significant lengths of time. + * + * After a platform has been validated to support pseudo-locking its + * hardware prefetch disable bits are included here as they are documented + * in the SDM. + * + * RETURNS + * If platform is supported, the bits to disable hardware prefetchers, 0 + * if platform is not supported. + */ +static u64 get_prefetch_disable_bits(void) +{ + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || + boot_cpu_data.x86 != 6) + return 0; + + switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) { + case INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X: + /* + * SDM defines bits of MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL register + * as: + * 0 L2 Hardware Prefetcher Disable (R/W) + * 1 L2 Adjacent Cache Line Prefetcher Disable (R/W) + * 2 DCU Hardware Prefetcher Disable (R/W) + * 3 DCU IP Prefetcher Disable (R/W) + * 63:4 Reserved + */ + return 0xF; + case INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GOLDMONT: + case INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_GEMINI_LAKE: + /* + * SDM defines bits of MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL register + * as: + * 0 L2 Hardware Prefetcher Disable (R/W) + * 1 Reserved + * 2 DCU Hardware Prefetcher Disable (R/W) + * 63:3 Reserved + */ + return 0x5; + } + + return 0; +} + +/** * rdt_pseudo_lock_fs_init - Create and initialize pseudo-locking files * @root: location in kernfs where directory and files should be created * @@ -377,6 +442,17 @@ int rdt_pseudo_lock_fs_init(struct kernfs_node *root) lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex); + /* + * Not knowing the bits to disable prefetching is not a failure + * that should be propagated since we only return prefetching bits + * for those platforms pseudo-locking has been tested on. If + * pseudo-locking has not been tested to work on this platform the + * other RDT features should continue to be available. + */ + prefetch_disable_bits = get_prefetch_disable_bits(); + if (prefetch_disable_bits == 0) + return 0; + pseudo_lock_kn = kernfs_create_dir(root, "pseudo_lock", root->mode, NULL); if (IS_ERR(pseudo_lock_kn)) @@ -420,6 +496,10 @@ int rdt_pseudo_lock_fs_init(struct kernfs_node *root) void rdt_pseudo_lock_fs_remove(void) { lockdep_assert_held(&rdtgroup_mutex); + + if (!pseudo_lock_kn) + return; + mutex_lock(&rdt_pseudo_lock_mutex); if (new_plr) { -- 2.13.6