Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S272433AbTGaJlc (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:41:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S272443AbTGaJlc (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:41:32 -0400 Received: from hera.cwi.nl ([192.16.191.8]:7895 "EHLO hera.cwi.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S272433AbTGaJlb (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 05:41:31 -0400 From: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:41:25 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: To: fvw@var.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test2+Util-linux/cryptoapi Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-crypto@nl.linux.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 910 Lines: 25 > First of all, in util-linux 2.12 the keybits option is gone > I wanted to have losetup/mount hash the passphrase The patches I got were maximal, too much junk. So I went for a minimal version instead. It is usable (when the kernel part is stable, which it isn't today) but mount/losetup may well acquire a few options before it is conveniently usable. (I do not read crypto lists, and see only a very small fraction of what passes by on lk, so if you want to influence util-linux an explicit cc is a good idea.) > has the encryption setup changed again since 2.4.x with hvr's > testing cryptoapi stuff? cryptoloop as it went in is essentially hvr's. Andries - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/