Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp479043wrg; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 02:01:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227emzdOFnUbc+vqZYbu4kFJPftEGdC21wICeZ95ZMjn1ihJkYHqkLszBkQUCNHVlvWU9EG9 X-Received: by 10.98.102.89 with SMTP id a86mr1198432pfc.121.1518602482369; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 02:01:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518602482; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lvXbb+i1MCoa97CVw2C/PiQxzAXGKBwdsB8MPdS1oEm4R1l5mqpEx2GZL7hxFL30jC epudYdPEnPXw3baz4lTETPLp1N4Z6rZq67QNRBFK0wo83/PgkNf3CLZfcVj9p78PlVFE Tehe1Vf6GlGntZpR7/Iha79UNOdOlLxDZFXkP8vpc0Mnm8DxRrHl/V+K1mhqOUqYk7Rl IvpyYOZgluLKICh4S2fxnC1acAossnFtXdCTiPvkFAkL0fcTedh/V6bz0+pXE6slkJsm NceN3/HGetzWifIPMIN3AX6LhFnfiSMXgUamyteZtZvWBf0PUo5b9nNvL6mFg0lguahg dhcw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:content-id:mime-version :comments:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=4MRBWRWhYCt4BfIajaBc5U7HdUC+n69lWjxQNwCEQxM=; b=SG37lFDzQGa+7yq9GnEQ2BkWGViT7BSBP6K5Z5vcg4mca+d23RAdwCPZl6X0JObpAa k1DOnL+pkdKIhGzK1zianF6UzTxhLbAwPhWH8wAzxwnUKo3skoy6pXpWuj7IFxE1FbeF DWxlHLzdz6NNt/tGkMxLWgPp9Ma7wcGCIG9AcZ7r4QewBvdkNklswCNo8vIdUxxhkokH 7aeZlJSXgDUJnP7+VbPEkTH3YpesBYLZSddxh1+xrXWKM+7aXi+XOv7WLMy0mvqBrVJh koAIVvdP8Wg4UPW3uRY9u6OOop47l3liw/Us5VV//ncuLbfG9+J82k5qwsk8+HvPXXPo KF3A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f10-v6si1335667plm.169.2018.02.14.02.01.07; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 02:01:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967028AbeBNKAY (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 05:00:24 -0500 Received: from h1.radempa.de ([176.9.142.194]:46520 "EHLO mail.cosmopool.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966706AbeBNKAU (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 05:00:20 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cosmopool.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB8E901999; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:00:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.cosmopool.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.your-server.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qWpWdcgDYcY9; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:00:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from stardust.g4.wien.funkfeuer.at (77.118.220.4.wireless.dyn.drei.com [77.118.220.4]) by mail.cosmopool.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 064C8900D12; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:00:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from lambda by stardust.g4.wien.funkfeuer.at with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eltrI-0000Kv-W3; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:00:13 +0100 From: Harald Geyer To: Mark Brown cc: Liam Girdwood , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH,RESEND2] regulator: fixed, gpio: dt: regulator-name is required property In-reply-to: <20180213154530.GF5988@sirena.org.uk> References: <1518532988-10990-1-git-send-email-harald@ccbib.org> <20180213154530.GF5988@sirena.org.uk> Comments: In-reply-to Mark Brown message dated "Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:45:30 +0000." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1295.1518602412.1@stardust.g4.wien.funkfeuer.at> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 11:00:12 +0100 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mark Brown writes: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 02:43:08PM +0000, Harald Geyer wrote: > > > BTW, it took me a bit to figure out that by "content free ping" you are > > refering to the quoting of the patch. Maybe you can reword your canned > > response to make it easier to understand. > > No, a content free ping is when you just send a reply saying something > to the effect of "hey, what's going on with this?". Well, I did quote the entire patch and gave a summary of the status as far as I know it. So I really don't understand why I got the "no content free pings" response ... > As I said in my > reply best case the answer is going to be "I have no idea, you need to > resend since I'll need the patch to do anything with it" and worst case > it just won't get seen at all if the thing really did get buried > somehow. So you are saying you don't want pings as followups to patches at all, if the patch is old enough that it probably got lost? I guess that would make sense too, but again it's not obvious to read the canned response that way.