Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 6/8] media: i2c: Add TDA1997x HDMI receiver driver
To:     Tim Harvey <tharvey@gateworks.com>
Cc:     linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@gmail.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
        Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
References: <1518157956-14220-1-git-send-email-tharvey@gateworks.com>
 <1518157956-14220-7-git-send-email-tharvey@gateworks.com>
 <cf5c51f4-ca86-e468-ba16-d47d224a2428@xs4all.nl>
 <CAJ+vNU0ZCamOaJ2dZ_jisxcLFrUCTtajdvabBsHgpuedCVFbyw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <890204e0-489b-1bd6-d4c5-14e6437e8edc@xs4all.nl>
Date:   Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:08:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJ+vNU0ZCamOaJ2dZ_jisxcLFrUCTtajdvabBsHgpuedCVFbyw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Tim,

On 12/02/18 23:27, Tim Harvey wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:08 AM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> We're almost there. Two more comments:
>>
>> On 02/09/2018 07:32 AM, Tim Harvey wrote:
>>> +static int
>>> +tda1997x_detect_std(struct tda1997x_state *state,
>>> +                 struct v4l2_dv_timings *timings)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct v4l2_subdev *sd = &state->sd;
>>> +     u32 vper;
>>> +     u16 hper;
>>> +     u16 hsper;
>>> +     int i;
>>> +
>>> +     /*
>>> +      * Read the FMT registers
>>> +      *   REG_V_PER: Period of a frame (or two fields) in MCLK(27MHz) cycles
>>> +      *   REG_H_PER: Period of a line in MCLK(27MHz) cycles
>>> +      *   REG_HS_WIDTH: Period of horiz sync pulse in MCLK(27MHz) cycles
>>> +      */
>>> +     vper = io_read24(sd, REG_V_PER) & MASK_VPER;
>>> +     hper = io_read16(sd, REG_H_PER) & MASK_HPER;
>>> +     hsper = io_read16(sd, REG_HS_WIDTH) & MASK_HSWIDTH;
>>> +     if (!vper || !hper || !hsper)
>>> +             return -ENOLINK;
>>
>> See my comment for g_input_status below. This condition looks more like a
>> ENOLCK.
>>
>> Or perhaps it should be:
>>
>>         if (!vper && !hper && !hsper)
>>                 return -ENOLINK;
>>         if (!vper || !hper || !hsper)
>>                 return -ENOLCK;
>>
>> I would recommend that you test a bit with no signal and a bad signal (perhaps
>> one that uses a pixelclock that is too high for this device?).
> 
> I can't figure out how to produce a signal that can't be locked onto
> with what I have available.

Are you using a signal generator or just a laptop or something similar as the
source?

Without a good signal generator it is tricky to test this. A very long HDMI
cable would likely do it. But for 1080p60 you probably need 20 meters or
more.

> 
>>
>>> +     v4l2_dbg(1, debug, sd, "Signal Timings: %u/%u/%u\n", vper, hper, hsper);
>>> +
>>> +     for (i = 0; v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i].bt.width; i++) {
>>> +             const struct v4l2_bt_timings *bt;
>>> +             u32 lines, width, _hper, _hsper;
>>> +             u32 vmin, vmax, hmin, hmax, hsmin, hsmax;
>>> +             bool vmatch, hmatch, hsmatch;
>>> +
>>> +             bt = &v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i].bt;
>>> +             width = V4L2_DV_BT_FRAME_WIDTH(bt);
>>> +             lines = V4L2_DV_BT_FRAME_HEIGHT(bt);
>>> +             _hper = (u32)bt->pixelclock / width;
>>> +             if (bt->interlaced)
>>> +                     lines /= 2;
>>> +             /* vper +/- 0.7% */
>>> +             vmin = ((27000000 / 1000) * 993) / _hper * lines;
>>> +             vmax = ((27000000 / 1000) * 1007) / _hper * lines;
>>> +             /* hper +/- 1.0% */
>>> +             hmin = ((27000000 / 100) * 99) / _hper;
>>> +             hmax = ((27000000 / 100) * 101) / _hper;
>>> +             /* hsper +/- 2 (take care to avoid 32bit overflow) */
>>> +             _hsper = 27000 * bt->hsync / ((u32)bt->pixelclock/1000);
>>> +             hsmin = _hsper - 2;
>>> +             hsmax = _hsper + 2;
>>> +
>>> +             /* vmatch matches the framerate */
>>> +             vmatch = ((vper <= vmax) && (vper >= vmin)) ? 1 : 0;
>>> +             /* hmatch matches the width */
>>> +             hmatch = ((hper <= hmax) && (hper >= hmin)) ? 1 : 0;
>>> +             /* hsmatch matches the hswidth */
>>> +             hsmatch = ((hsper <= hsmax) && (hsper >= hsmin)) ? 1 : 0;
>>> +             if (hmatch && vmatch && hsmatch) {
>>> +                     *timings = v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i];
>>> +                     v4l2_print_dv_timings(sd->name, "Detected format: ",
>>> +                                           timings, false);
>>> +                     return 0;
>>> +             }
>>> +     }
>>> +
>>> +     v4l_err(state->client, "no resolution match for timings: %d/%d/%d\n",
>>> +             vper, hper, hsper);
>>> +     return -EINVAL;
>>> +}
>>
>> -EINVAL isn't the correct error code here. I would go for -ERANGE. It's not
>> perfect, but close enough.
>>
>> -EINVAL indicates that the user filled in wrong values, but that's not the
>> case here.
> 
> done
> 
>>
>>> +static int
>>> +tda1997x_g_input_status(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 *status)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct tda1997x_state *state = to_state(sd);
>>> +     u32 vper;
>>> +     u16 hper;
>>> +     u16 hsper;
>>> +
>>> +     mutex_lock(&state->lock);
>>> +     v4l2_dbg(1, debug, sd, "inputs:%d/%d\n",
>>> +              state->input_detect[0], state->input_detect[1]);
>>> +     if (state->input_detect[0] || state->input_detect[1])
>>
>> I'm confused. This device has two HDMI inputs?
>>
>> Does 'detecting input' equate to 'I see a signal and I am locked'?
>> I gather from the irq function that sets these values that it is closer
>> to 'I see a signal' and that 'I am locked' is something you would test
>> by looking at the vper/hper/hsper.
> 
> The TDA19972 and/or TDA19973 has an A and B input but only a single
> output. I'm not entirely clear if/how to select between the two and I
> don't have proper documentation for the three chips.
> 
> The TDA19971 which I have on my board only has 1 input which is
> reported as the 'A' input. I can likely nuke the stuff looking at the
> B input and/or put some qualifiers around it but I didn't want to
> remove code that was derived from some vendor code that might help
> support the other chips in the future. So I would rather like to leave
> the 'if A or B' stuff.

OK. Can you add a comment somewhere in the driver about this?

It sounds like it is similar to what the adv7604 has: several inputs but
only one is used for streaming. But the EDID is made available on both inputs.

>>
>>> +             *status = 0;
>>> +     else {
>>> +             vper = io_read24(sd, REG_V_PER) & MASK_VPER;
>>> +             hper = io_read16(sd, REG_H_PER) & MASK_HPER;
>>> +             hsper = io_read16(sd, REG_HS_WIDTH) & MASK_HSWIDTH;
>>> +             v4l2_dbg(1, debug, sd, "timings:%d/%d/%d\n", vper, hper, hsper);
>>> +             if (!vper || !hper || !hsper)
>>> +                     *status |= V4L2_IN_ST_NO_SYNC;
>>> +             else
>>> +                     *status |= V4L2_IN_ST_NO_SIGNAL;
>>
>> So if we have valid vper, hper and hsper, then there is no signal? That doesn't
>> make sense.
>>
>> I'd expect to see something like this:
>>
>>         if (!input_detect[0] && !input_detect[1])
>>                 // no signal
>>         else if (!vper || !hper || !vsper)
>>                 // no sync
>>         else
>>                 // have signal and sync
> 
> sure... reads a bit cleaner. I can't guarantee that any of
> vper/hper/vsper will be 0 if a signal can't be locked onto without
> proper documentation or ability to generate such a signal. I do know
> if I yank the source I get non-zero random values and must rely on the
> input_detect logic.

Add a comment about this as well. It's good to be clear that this code
is partially guesswork and partially based on testing.

> 
>>
>> I'm not sure about the precise meaning of input_detect, so I might be wrong about
>> that bit.
> 
> ya... me either. I'm trying my hardest to get this driver up to shape
> but the documentation I have is utter crap and I'm doing some guessing
> as well as to what all the registers are and what the meaning of the
> very obfuscated vendor code does.
> 
> would you object to detecting timings and displaying via v4l2_dbg when
> a resolution change is detected (just not 'using' those timings for
> anything?):

No, not at all. Also useful is to log the detected timings in the log_status
call. It is *very* handy when testing.

I.e. if 'v4l2-ctl --log-status' gives you both the configured timings and the
detected timings, then that makes it much easier to debug the driver.

> 
> @@ -1384,6 +1386,7 @@ static void tda1997x_irq_sus(struct tda1997x_state *state,
>  u8 *flags)
>                         v4l_err(state->client, "BAD SUS STATUS\n");
>                         return;
>                 }
> +               if (debug)
> +                              tda1997x_detect_std(state, NULL);
>                 /* notify user of change in resolution */
>                 v4l2_subdev_notify_event(&state->sd, &tda1997x_ev_fmt);
>         }
> 
> @@ -1140,16 +1140,18 @@ tda1997x_detect_std(struct tda1997x_state *state,
>                 /* hsmatch matches the hswidth */
>                 hsmatch = ((hsper <= hsmax) && (hsper >= hsmin)) ? 1 : 0;
>                 if (hmatch && vmatch && hsmatch) {
> -                       *timings = v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i];
>                         v4l2_print_dv_timings(sd->name, "Detected format: ",
> -                                             timings, false);
> +                                             &v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i],
> +                                             false);
> +                       if (timings)
> +                               *timings = v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i];
>                         return 0;
>                 }
>         }
> 
> It seems to make sense to me to be seeing a kernel message when
> timings change and what they change to without having to query :)

Right.

I'll wait for v11 and I'll make a pull request for it.

Regards,

	Hans