Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: plan9 semantics on Linux - mount namespaces
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@sigma-star.at>
Cc:     Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
        Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <0f058286-a432-379b-f559-f2fe713807ab@metux.net>
 <60748622.exvCVAzLTp@blindfold>
 <e924b563-44c6-d678-a6cc-1181f4b820d5@metux.net>
 <4042675.OEy7g9C5ya@blindfold>
From:   Enrico Weigelt <lkml@metux.net>
Organization: metux IT consult
Message-ID: <794929ce-0ecb-4c93-d51e-e94fcf749cfa@metux.net>
Date:   Wed, 14 Feb 2018 19:01:52 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4042675.OEy7g9C5ya@blindfold>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 14.02.2018 18:50, Richard Weinberger wrote:

>> hmm, now it works, but only when strace'ing it.
>> that's really strange.
> 
> On my box, with my patch applied, also busybox works now.

hmm, w/o strace, too ?
Which version are you using ? I've got 1.27.2

>> But still I wonder whether user_ns really solves my problem, as I don't
>> want to create sandboxed users, but only private namespaces just like
>> on Plan9.
> 
> Well, I'd be surprised if that works out of the box.
> Since you're posting on LKML I assumed you're hacking the kernel to support
> plan9-alike namespaces...

Yes, that's the plan :)


--mtx

-- 
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287