Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1613511wrg; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:39:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226xLcCyjNZtPZn7uzuDGl0pROErv1kgMWbzO26Z7ZbB8Ya/6DLwEVmQEKXcnXIjUJ31Fig+ X-Received: by 10.98.227.8 with SMTP id g8mr1524795pfh.200.1518673148752; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:39:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518673148; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=b+4K6s+2rgwVK8V+0X31R+D/1T6w+yMoBeBxZCZVWXSzVWmYEoRLm1midXaXtIqLbW ftIZmHtJQd4KN5pEpdMYe0zJwb3p9ngXyaKHsbzW0jyUuvdvuxBQRzlhVMIJ7e4hYDzY pp4giZJfmhbUnphvV3U4NOHyty0H5nzFHKbKLOzZfiDppbalkNlPgPAXOLyV1ZnAQL8d tsdy6yAOdwBhekVYoy8R3o1kA5A1OG3FyDaNwTrWOun+OBwjccHQFwKdN+zbKE+RKxq/ 5IWJ1Dv609WlopRJYjcNeNg1atzZlSHpoYr6OTgaaxVTYl1vOHV30PQ0pE4QL5hzYJeF zNVw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:arc-authentication-results; bh=KI8ig8AsWbfLGJfmRsTrI0jwxrjoAgA1NLeYHBT3bb4=; b=JxWuT698jcq1E4jQmDH3ibdn3MA1HWiXclr4Hw6csWeoPyzuH0p8Lh0J6/BVGyWh9W x7GxBv8D/zZ4aPv+wWTFT68ksRpOnECA0vvy+lxt6bM4cZr5h9+DZzMBHo+8M1kLck8h CmoWrwyCN4aB8QHOlLOS11haw38CvgrU+oUYyG7GraaRGuUnvG48Gd+7PdSG3ejoAAV6 eBnol3HXiw6lBwzyY4w3HnGFei9zzH1SxVXbd2uoYoonrguTkIDokZ5rXSvp+CTMQ70j ZEG4994wAyQ+O1jBvHl2TtRnsMbrhWS0pOhFlUwmBkEOO6MzD0PmL8dIfstnBfQv2MEd 86Xw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ntwX0od/; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z6-v6si2268176plo.200.2018.02.14.21.38.53; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:39:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ntwX0od/; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754793AbeBOFhE (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:37:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:36802 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754540AbeBOFgc (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:36:32 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f67.google.com with SMTP id j9so3454824pgv.3; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:36:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=KI8ig8AsWbfLGJfmRsTrI0jwxrjoAgA1NLeYHBT3bb4=; b=ntwX0od/i3dzviuaMtRzW/LdOewAtNJxqf+eWDrifZdXDeURQdb70oSvHm8HLaY0Y8 uXVMqbb1iPGU0Ulp8LkbHWU1OwWq4CUoQfzSypXaIFDX2Huwq/Pw4kjYcZimgydjMsdD 5XtaY26GdxzRt4UAn2Ow/t5XoVCnvMENIEFkUftw3poRAiVweNsvM+FAg+ctM4tJ8zkO hzhgx7xWSP8qwkwlR1l0KR/tdIDh2+VQPiR+HZFlRW+FxjZBKQK7l20ollbgnAgjnbRm gA7/wSxgaJ9kreKCUdU0g5Vnop1u2b0jINgpfWALD/WS2yQtaXNkEwoJ07sVsgjd1R8z Se2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=KI8ig8AsWbfLGJfmRsTrI0jwxrjoAgA1NLeYHBT3bb4=; b=XrW2ISCRTaVlkSxftU6zeLd/H7TTjyhAZip4SkQnsVEn03Oj+BqWW5ICMju8VTG6Ss TKLYjCRQaVV0V7tm7YOL4L2E3dxsc4bWqjAy5sMpFBdkwxa0gbyUpMsksDo44O2S5ZLa YS9e5ehU65muSQpoylM2k71jq4lNOju2wBxqmR5B7v4QnghybuEYbgSiG4eFmM/GTH8U ESBhzy5v3Pz/7Ehrn/VjzsHmu0anIyX666/sS9XIrtNqZOinjU9Az4+6nHNLE+9OLVrd Dxgzx9f324f2knID4d2M9VEDk7MFMZ1iE1xUumJeuB5NMULP7apv/iRVuQI24VasuveE TlJw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDJiFuGVi55ENLnPYLrs73CT61QLa7KYWlR1TxLuWrwjkO0w6k3 FwRfkpujpNNCp51GhUOb7fA= X-Received: by 10.99.120.199 with SMTP id t190mr1232054pgc.72.1518672992397; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-93-215-6.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.215.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d74sm44885032pfb.54.2018.02.14.21.36.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:36:31 -0800 (PST) From: frowand.list@gmail.com To: Rob Herring , pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com, Pantelis Antoniou Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] of: improve reporting invalid overlay target path Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:35:46 -0800 Message-Id: <1518672946-7310-5-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1518672946-7310-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> References: <1518672946-7310-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Frank Rowand Errors while developing the patch to create of_overlay_fdt_apply() exposed inadequate error messages to debug problems when overlay devicetree fragment nodes contain an invalid target path. Improve the messages in find_target_node() to remedy this. Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand --- changes from v2: - add fragment node name as suggested by Geert - existing error message printed short node name, thus not discriminating between fragments; change to full node name - existing error message printed node address, which is devicetree internal debugging, not useful in an overlay apply error message; remove node address from message drivers/of/overlay.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay.c b/drivers/of/overlay.c index 5f6c5569e97d..852e566d7744 100644 --- a/drivers/of/overlay.c +++ b/drivers/of/overlay.c @@ -488,20 +488,30 @@ static int build_changeset(struct overlay_changeset *ovcs) */ static struct device_node *find_target_node(struct device_node *info_node) { + struct device_node *node; const char *path; u32 val; int ret; ret = of_property_read_u32(info_node, "target", &val); - if (!ret) - return of_find_node_by_phandle(val); + if (!ret) { + node = of_find_node_by_phandle(val); + if (!node) + pr_err("find target, node: %pOF, phandle 0x%x not found\n", + info_node, val); + return node; + } ret = of_property_read_string(info_node, "target-path", &path); - if (!ret) - return of_find_node_by_path(path); + if (!ret) { + node = of_find_node_by_path(path); + if (!node) + pr_err("find target, node: %pOF, path '%s' not found\n", + info_node, path); + return node; + } - pr_err("Failed to find target for node %p (%s)\n", - info_node, info_node->name); + pr_err("find target, node: %pOF, no target property\n", info_node); return NULL; } -- Frank Rowand