Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267491AbTGaTdG (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:33:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269036AbTGaTdG (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:33:06 -0400 Received: from www.casdn.neu.edu ([155.33.251.101]:26629 "EHLO www.casdn.neu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267491AbTGaTdD (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:33:03 -0400 From: "Andrew Scott" Organization: Northeastern University To: Linux-Kernel Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 15:32:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: 2.4 -> 2.2 differences? Reply-to: A.J.Scott@casdn.neu.edu Message-ID: <3F29369E.22567.478F39A@localhost> In-reply-to: <20030725142434.GS32585@rdlg.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 926 Lines: 26 On 25 Jul 2003 at 10:24, Robert L. Harris wrote: > > > With all the SCO fun going on I have people asking me what functionality > we would loose if we rolled from 2.4.21 kernel to the last known stable > 2.2 kernel. > > Yes, weathering the lawsuit mess and all is a good plan but I'm still > being asked for this information. Does anyone have a link listing what > kind of functionality would be lost, performance impact (p3 and athalon > machines), etc? The only reason I'm still using 2.2 is that my binary of realserver won't run on 2.4.x. _ / \ / ascott@casdn.neu.edu / \ \ / / \_/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/