Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp514611wrg; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 02:48:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224zfVbmpJJobSItyaZMSESACHeA3umittAhsMOrhf+7lJTFLyYHCVrWt7OEwR17TkhueE3p X-Received: by 10.99.95.81 with SMTP id t78mr4913476pgb.380.1518778092771; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 02:48:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518778092; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=n642+bm2l4z0LFEnaE7M6j6EGmuTFVFR6i30ebk5sMUmbqPoFum29tq7XDpT2ePrTR cmHTBpAPQ+XIaqs7yn67l9/ypnYiYS/t/2bNmSt5BOudd7gDxfc5VPrNAygWHTTa2p6f d61dF78zirzrVDnVybz2AVt6axRX94kfHaimkT3wcxyWJSvDZ9dm3c/TRnTnRGGD+fOB MyudNCjrSu/1MYmxLrE6kV8RsUEIIzVs1cXdyoEc1LLql8aUUoYjDpnQcqlqqhQk+lVU 0AZzzHEAXK5G54l78fFeNfsg4eMZrRwKq7VohnDIwOmp2X/UhwlJeRH/B8bQnEHb/bUP p8kg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dmarc-filter:dkim-signature:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=ArqKhC9WN6X4DknMmzg8VLfNS++fsS5l/eOm0X4uUOA=; b=MbNnHeEebTyMLT2EayUNXopYMlCtOQ1NxNa1yFKo1dl8w+6MfbAXEWkZMarTnmRWc/ sSe0g5Xc8xje2+ERtik9rsc84h3NttTAZKUuI6Qs4qLK+DhMdCoDFfMA0gFilS0/N/5I OyN1KuuQPlP8jJb8DFPqffmKltNhezgL2EUhc1ffODuXImyRWphLc5805Y6Gz7A6qKIJ Qv0SXUcuV7NFysh45zJ13huRSQEnutQosorDao6jLD4mgEDUyRGTJuIqDlsOux1Jljtd Y0zWPKRK+SoRjMDjK/TynZN9ND3MQar4gRRMvQzRUz+d0lakRI9NK+l/P9RjBuCjfTgL BEaw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=L4UynDO8; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=L4UynDO8; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d5si422472pfl.224.2018.02.16.02.47.58; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 02:48:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=L4UynDO8; dkim=pass header.i=@codeaurora.org header.s=default header.b=L4UynDO8; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1427442AbeBORfd (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:35:33 -0500 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:43538 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1427411AbeBORf2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:35:28 -0500 Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D2B2D60F71; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:35:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1518716127; bh=LenQSIcjzHPveAxdeGNYmcJ9SpAn2x1ha46Wtp2EQpU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=L4UynDO828Mnf/jOT+VA2LMc0FnatF+A2J+W1W3jYGAFj5+rOjOr7fXfJIxm0PgSj qCnV1w/mc8j6DEC7/izxnM9LfzqEVeF9jM3NEEsIYuMtc74Jbg46loCJ8ZF+IIXVlh +cEEOCADdexV+Pxgf+widP4UsMF2Yvj3J7Y/fgjE= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=2.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from codeaurora.org (i-global254.qualcomm.com [199.106.103.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ilina@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A36F60585; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:35:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=codeaurora.org; s=default; t=1518716127; bh=LenQSIcjzHPveAxdeGNYmcJ9SpAn2x1ha46Wtp2EQpU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=L4UynDO828Mnf/jOT+VA2LMc0FnatF+A2J+W1W3jYGAFj5+rOjOr7fXfJIxm0PgSj qCnV1w/mc8j6DEC7/izxnM9LfzqEVeF9jM3NEEsIYuMtc74Jbg46loCJ8ZF+IIXVlh +cEEOCADdexV+Pxgf+widP4UsMF2Yvj3J7Y/fgjE= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 9A36F60585 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ilina@codeaurora.org From: Lina Iyer To: andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: rnayak@codeaurora.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lina Iyer Subject: [PATCH v2 09/10] drivers: qcom: rpmh: add support for batch RPMH request Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 10:35:06 -0700 Message-Id: <20180215173507.10989-10-ilina@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.1 In-Reply-To: <20180215173507.10989-1-ilina@codeaurora.org> References: <20180215173507.10989-1-ilina@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Platform drivers need make a lot of resource state requests at the same time, say, at the start or end of an usecase. It can be quite inefficient to send each request separately. Instead they can give the RPMH library a batch of requests to be sent and wait on the whole transaction to be complete. rpmh_write_batch() is a blocking call that can be used to send multiple RPMH command sets. Each RPMH command set is set asynchronously and the API blocks until all the command sets are complete and receive their tx_done callbacks. Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer --- drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c | 150 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h | 8 +++ 2 files changed, 158 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c index dff4c46be3af..6f60bb9a4dfa 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmh.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ #define RPMH_MAX_MBOXES 2 #define RPMH_TIMEOUT (10 * HZ) +#define RPMH_MAX_REQ_IN_BATCH 10 #define DEFINE_RPMH_MSG_ONSTACK(rc, s, q, c, name) \ struct rpmh_request name = { \ @@ -81,12 +82,14 @@ struct rpmh_request { * @cache: the list of cached requests * @lock: synchronize access to the controller data * @dirty: was the cache updated since flush + * @batch_cache: Cache sleep and wake requests sent as batch */ struct rpmh_ctrlr { struct rsc_drv *drv; struct list_head cache; spinlock_t lock; bool dirty; + struct rpmh_request *batch_cache[2 * RPMH_MAX_REQ_IN_BATCH]; }; /** @@ -343,6 +346,146 @@ int rpmh_write(struct rpmh_client *rc, enum rpmh_state state, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmh_write); +static int cache_batch(struct rpmh_client *rc, + struct rpmh_request **rpm_msg, int count) +{ + struct rpmh_ctrlr *rpm = rc->ctrlr; + unsigned long flags; + int ret = 0; + int index = 0; + int i; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&rpm->lock, flags); + while (rpm->batch_cache[index]) + index++; + if (index + count >= 2 * RPMH_MAX_REQ_IN_BATCH) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto fail; + } + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) + rpm->batch_cache[index + i] = rpm_msg[i]; +fail: + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rpm->lock, flags); + + return ret; +} + +static int flush_batch(struct rpmh_client *rc) +{ + struct rpmh_ctrlr *rpm = rc->ctrlr; + struct rpmh_request *rpm_msg; + unsigned long flags; + int ret = 0; + int i; + + /* Send Sleep/Wake requests to the controller, expect no response */ + spin_lock_irqsave(&rpm->lock, flags); + for (i = 0; rpm->batch_cache[i]; i++) { + rpm_msg = rpm->batch_cache[i]; + ret = rpmh_rsc_write_ctrl_data(rc->ctrlr->drv, &rpm_msg->msg); + if (ret) + break; + } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rpm->lock, flags); + + return ret; +} + +static void invalidate_batch(struct rpmh_client *rc) +{ + struct rpmh_ctrlr *rpm = rc->ctrlr; + unsigned long flags; + int index = 0; + int i; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&rpm->lock, flags); + while (rpm->batch_cache[index]) + index++; + for (i = 0; i < index; i++) { + kfree(rpm->batch_cache[i]->free); + rpm->batch_cache[i] = NULL; + } + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rpm->lock, flags); +} + +/** + * rpmh_write_batch: Write multiple sets of RPMH commands and wait for the + * batch to finish. + * + * @rc: The RPMh handle got from rpmh_get_dev_channel + * @state: Active/sleep set + * @cmd: The payload data + * @n: The array of count of elements in each batch, 0 terminated. + * + * Write a request to the mailbox controller without caching. If the request + * state is ACTIVE, then the requests are treated as completion request + * and sent to the controller immediately. The function waits until all the + * commands are complete. If the request was to SLEEP or WAKE_ONLY, then the + * request is sent as fire-n-forget and no ack is expected. + * + * May sleep. Do not call from atomic contexts for ACTIVE_ONLY requests. + */ +int rpmh_write_batch(struct rpmh_client *rc, enum rpmh_state state, + struct tcs_cmd *cmd, int *n) +{ + struct rpmh_request *rpm_msg[RPMH_MAX_REQ_IN_BATCH] = { NULL }; + DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(compl); + atomic_t wait_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0); /* overwritten */ + int count = 0; + int ret, i, j; + + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rc) || !cmd || !n) + return -EINVAL; + + while (n[count++] > 0) + ; + count--; + if (!count || count > RPMH_MAX_REQ_IN_BATCH) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Create async request batches */ + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + rpm_msg[i] = __get_rpmh_msg_async(rc, state, cmd, n[i]); + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rpm_msg[i])) { + for (j = 0 ; j < i; j++) + kfree(rpm_msg[j]->free); + return PTR_ERR(rpm_msg[i]); + } + cmd += n[i]; + } + + /* Send if Active and wait for the whole set to complete */ + if (state == RPMH_ACTIVE_ONLY_STATE) { + might_sleep(); + atomic_set(&wait_count, count); + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + rpm_msg[i]->completion = &compl; + rpm_msg[i]->wait_count = &wait_count; + /* Bypass caching and write to mailbox directly */ + ret = rpmh_rsc_send_data(rc->ctrlr->drv, + &rpm_msg[i]->msg); + if (ret < 0) { + pr_err( + "Error(%d) sending RPMH message addr=0x%x\n", + ret, rpm_msg[i]->msg.payload[0].addr); + break; + } + } + /* For those unsent requests, spoof tx_done */ + for (j = i; j < count; j++) + rpmh_tx_done(&rpm_msg[j]->msg, ret); + return wait_for_tx_done(rc, &compl, cmd[0].addr, cmd[0].data); + } + + /* + * Cache sleep/wake data in store. + * But flush batch first before flushing all other data. + */ + return cache_batch(rc, rpm_msg, count); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmh_write_batch); + static int is_req_valid(struct cache_req *req) { return (req->sleep_val != UINT_MAX && @@ -394,6 +537,11 @@ int rpmh_flush(struct rpmh_client *rc) } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rpm->lock, flags); + /* First flush the cached batch requests */ + ret = flush_batch(rc); + if (ret) + return ret; + /* * Nobody else should be calling this function other than system PM,, * hence we can run without locks. @@ -438,6 +586,8 @@ int rpmh_invalidate(struct rpmh_client *rc) if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rc)) return -EINVAL; + invalidate_batch(rc); + spin_lock_irqsave(&rpm->lock, flags); rpm->dirty = true; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rpm->lock, flags); diff --git a/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h b/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h index 172a649f1a1c..6dc1042534d6 100644 --- a/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h +++ b/include/soc/qcom/rpmh.h @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ int rpmh_write(struct rpmh_client *rc, enum rpmh_state state, int rpmh_write_async(struct rpmh_client *rc, enum rpmh_state state, struct tcs_cmd *cmd, int n); +int rpmh_write_batch(struct rpmh_client *rc, enum rpmh_state state, + struct tcs_cmd *cmd, int *n); + struct rpmh_client *rpmh_get_client(struct platform_device *pdev); int rpmh_flush(struct rpmh_client *rc); @@ -40,6 +43,11 @@ static inline int rpmh_write_async(struct rpmh_client *rc, struct tcs_cmd *cmd, int n) { return -ENODEV; } +static inline int rpmh_write_batch(struct rpmh_client *rc, + enum rpmh_state state, + struct tcs_cmd *cmd, int *n) +{ return -ENODEV; } + static inline int rpmh_flush(struct rpmh_client *rc) { return -ENODEV; } -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project