Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp777022wrg; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:04:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224zu8fRqPJQJuv2EVday15p6c97g8sOMW1ALnLDrAM14nwYpOD6uUk9V+5ehWdFluLGhPQS X-Received: by 10.101.93.142 with SMTP id f14mr5236821pgt.82.1518793462475; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:04:22 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518793462; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uQXK54AwGOBBBSxdEg48uaZRgPmGmOOZjp6+AHYn7Vk8YMI5Q8uGsugWtGdCfUJ01E kGjyMdtB6mgq0Xo5CyZ4ci9NIZbyjso95ZuBvRbVLLbs8qz2KvQWikq54Z2kDp6Fe9P7 lJcwf5N2Cld+gtDTgKeiIDTDKwbBzABZPzxASUcO/ud88N0V1qigzXMXYEmWyqdS5hm/ re80xZ+nUCUKe0uJWP990GXPikgOGTj8it3CybqSxtxsGR3+wsYYYoN+m7A22Q1h/vwc YlK5xhYWPqIPTRaiSR9SYNyplgNCtGQhoejwcH5emcubrPLcBaQiZU4LKoP1tFmx00Zb ijEQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:cc:references:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=N8mse1egC8ekOQsJFWapqODu6xE5rht+6Pp/WYHWo1U=; b=lKAkP2Nu0iIeHQCW9OlgwDGmR0V80ZWOnBKWfVNVt6eFMUAe/d9o79M0a2fI5b+rOy NflrOvN/MjtBmQUAm6kCTylbFZMCXHh1VtbYlNEZJIbtKD96yDK33bjYIHpglxFRDDM6 FSemsNjhbD0gTCwQhYZP0ojGaEVMyDI8kLQ7IzmGjJBdL8A9p1Y27mZaU6O53NRqopUO YeQoxla3wvK+z1Dm2Q6Y7k/BOa/NpBkvWC3VOs3Xdef/vqLFjdm1g0Ib+OKo/BO79KXp KdZDZpXBVEwn2mCInjxHzhD/y7X3SAAp4buP886BTfGcXPbpnwjjnivANShsQ/a4AwJL +bQA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s13si4640722pfk.177.2018.02.16.07.03.43; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:04:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755797AbeBOUcw (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:32:52 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:28029 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755639AbeBOUcv (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:32:51 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2018 12:32:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,518,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="27634628" Received: from hmirand-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.65.219]) ([10.254.65.219]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2018 12:32:50 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 5/6] x86: Use global pages when PTI is disabled To: Andy Lutomirski , Nadav Amit References: <20180215163602.61162-1-namit@vmware.com> <20180215163602.61162-6-namit@vmware.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Willy Tarreau , Nadav Amit , X86 ML , LKML From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <3f69237a-ee32-3d06-dacd-a7f7897f6251@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 12:32:50 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/15/2018 11:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h >> @@ -319,6 +319,12 @@ static inline void set_cpu_pti_disable(unsigned short disable) >> WARN_ON_ONCE(preemptible()); >> >> pti_update_user_cs64(cpu_pti_disable(), disable); >> + if (__supported_pte_mask & _PAGE_GLOBAL) { >> + if (disable) >> + cr4_set_bits(X86_CR4_PGE); >> + else >> + cr4_clear_bits(X86_CR4_PGE); >> + } > This will be *extremely* slow, and I don't see the point at all. What > are you accomplishing here? It won't be slow if you always run compat processes, I guess. But mixing these in here will eat a big chunk of the benefit of having global pages (or PCIDs for that matter) in the first place.