Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp834957wrg; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:58:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225sCotqXT3xMCoyzxN3b4CqyM7CXgKqo2xNjGI1SaqLSaEs1eCW4YqsDBQt3Ae6dZrb/jDb X-Received: by 10.98.131.139 with SMTP id h133mr6480025pfe.155.1518796689297; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:58:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518796689; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V5dWGxI9p1dJZwTRWe3fju4n+yJ0fHq2aPPI9NhKLVokk4PsfBxQqQCx1SNb98SDva UIooBxhG7cQ0VLvM31RpqBZO+T8/z40DtwziPXHpRJYkUhc5qbc4LGG7mWPg1ye6T7tk 6mklPjaQTC+WZD2dQbZKTnpPN1MoDbnYKGFFvVGy2iThzRuU/twAHoGDVgplBHUhF85C hC3+R35nx4KX+SLzhentf1l09RjPRiXMrUEdGhMJk7ui2cZfffkErykAMMa6B3eeUKhb kqnd4TCcTRAg+Psa9r2gIDYAGgh3Wyp5QoRmQCt1S2tC4T+QEkZDlbnIRXUkK/seaujm 9KXQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:cc:references:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=UMzaQI3ua96RUa8nh48M81Acv41M+cmwza78RMt0Jy4=; b=dt2/f8a6xS2rnnmHRik+bygAfjwNp47dppc+VtRvarfJlqjB6bxFRkVsKTAWWQ9eJr t1o9kcw3CJx1Sfmbsl7UR7RMDbdA81CDLncJtoMs2LLxTARSzPqtQQ6FG8OUX4Y9l6eY FEpwx1aQI4G/49wbU+3GRfjPFEn2LQnq/Q1D7Kpu8Xr8j75vZFzhaETTAezn2JlkKY0r 6IfHTM81UjXlQxGNfNrqlwZBCnZymJft++gkwQhnq0M9FQ4B6coJWwLXwV/3z/QrqJAa gHzEIKHeTHq8SESQIN+8KhS8uWLBW4vfj65tvQAQABcSeu/uK/XjKm7Z4DDHSeP01WQi kwig== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v22si59202pfd.22.2018.02.16.07.57.54; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:58:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753068AbeBOXzr (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:55:47 -0500 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:38177 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752887AbeBOXzq (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 18:55:46 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Feb 2018 15:55:46 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,518,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="175720089" Received: from hmirand-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.65.219]) ([10.254.65.219]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2018 15:55:45 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use global pages with PTI To: Linus Torvalds References: <20180215132053.6C9B48C8@viggo.jf.intel.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm , Andrew Lutomirski , Kees Cook , Hugh Dickins , =?UTF-8?B?SsO8cmdlbiBHcm/Dnw==?= , the arch/x86 maintainers From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <91298252-6cef-d4ee-fa77-eb4008eb5f53@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:55:45 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/15/2018 09:47 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 5:20 AM, Dave Hansen > wrote: >> During the switch over to PTI, we seem to have lost our ability to have >> GLOBAL mappings. ... > Did you perhaps re-run any benchmark numbers just to verify? Because > it's always good to back up patches that should improve performance > with actual numbers.. Same test as last time except I'm using all 4 cores on a Skylake desktop instead of just 1. The test is this: > https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale/blob/master/tests/lseek1.c With PCIDs, lseek()s/second go up around 2% to 3% with the these patches enabling the global bit (it's noisy). I measured it at 3% before, so definitely the same ballpark. That was also before all of Andy's trampoline stuff and the syscall fast path removal.