Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 15 Feb 2018 20:48:33 +0100
From:   Lukas Senger <lukas@fridolin.com>
To:     Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pps-gpio: Avoid flooding syslog
Message-ID: <20180215204833.4fe3ef3d@dinghy.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <a9b965fe-fee2-3aab-0f2c-681d2835070c@enneenne.com>
References: <ee4fdd16-0343-1a01-63a7-06046026659a@enneenne.com>
        <20180215125921.29494-1-lukas@fridolin.com>
        <20180215125921.29494-2-lukas@fridolin.com>
        <6c424674-e8f0-eaf1-c056-889e354b43b7@enneenne.com>
        <20180215161238.23e0c117@dinghy.localdomain>
        <a9b965fe-fee2-3aab-0f2c-681d2835070c@enneenne.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

> The pps_event() function does it for you in a beauty-and-clear way by
> using the info.echo() function. :-D

I thought it would increase latency to use info.echo() but I just
measured it and there is no significant difference. I guess it was a
case of premature optimization :)

Cheers,
Lukas