Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1037877wrg; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:15:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224HndIH9TeYsI90n1ultfUQBoiLOsqu75bHXsr35cFvFdsLUpk0+RNs6IyA0sd/yBUP4el0 X-Received: by 10.101.100.9 with SMTP id a9mr5918734pgv.102.1518808517559; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:15:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518808517; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=myzqeGlFNIHjdfgaHo5Mh4Ytb1ILIlmKSXu0UovLDC8PSJuAqgG/5vmplODCtpHpMJ ELjXYc2Ra83ghAaOeRA0kJcEiIj4eeUU1LIGBRnMf7/Y2TGk+JXiNYibVtCGWzT9QLll AEx6H6ruq5MFAoSps311JyYuY7zRlpFP1/jDRHSyvL37G+aYayVjdxkLIVg3Gl2FFHJd SzHXhUI7UXjl4s8TihItvyKxpMggvT07eTE0v1Gons4Y37bqXudPSUz9VXwpfAYHlZ+0 gsoXS/jideqQfmLRfHAd6JGKxgDjcx0M59OnS/R9LBszhknUl+wSuHjyZzd8P0/8H/DX RClg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=gDLsXFdErhx7KIndxIIi0nkoBgxRF3DEE5V7WTeN3io=; b=Exg7oRnHkrKNjtbx6n3fKI4QN1SVG32gcsUJP0oSKR1dZCaGD9Ce4YxmGcF1q6bFAP P3yDM91AbaToRi0fpI7VuyQzEiEC+Fq5eO1CI+qDgQkcWoFrxJX5XU+iyviyKIzvI1um 53nZuYTwl7xeqy89II5L9VNeFgFztwDJu8GiLjyrXVCGvg2ZBLW8huZaB8EHGEm0qK8/ 3dLM13TVfk5Wyosv+5yhyiFMIfwcc8FN9jKEup6sn8rLaC91L5Bd6QGcztQGIf2Z1ngs P2BZoN96jloTdEMenfmepW9zxyBIZFHfZA940aUpzaCmPqkyx0o177XCOcavER79WyA7 /j7w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z12si187306pgp.788.2018.02.16.11.15.02; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:15:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755416AbeBPP0Z (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:26:25 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:34446 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755429AbeBPP0S (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:26:18 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1GFPG6R083084 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:26:18 -0500 Received: from e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2g61dm9f3t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 10:26:17 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:26:14 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp10.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.140) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:26:06 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w1GFQ5GB47972574; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:26:05 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720F542041; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:18:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697254203F; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:18:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nimbus.lab.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com (unknown [9.145.186.2]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:18:47 +0000 (GMT) From: Laurent Dufour To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrea Arcangeli , Alexei Starovoitov , kemi.wang@intel.com, sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, Daniel Jordan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, Tim Chen , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v8 07/24] mm: VMA sequence count Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:25:21 +0100 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1518794738-4186-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1518794738-4186-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18021615-0040-0000-0000-000004137361 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18021615-0041-0000-0000-000026167780 Message-Id: <1518794738-4186-8-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2018-02-16_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1709140000 definitions=main-1802160183 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra Wrap the VMA modifications (vma_adjust/unmap_page_range) with sequence counts such that we can easily test if a VMA is changed. The unmap_page_range() one allows us to make assumptions about page-tables; when we find the seqcount hasn't changed we can assume page-tables are still valid. The flip side is that we cannot distinguish between a vma_adjust() and the unmap_page_range() -- where with the former we could have re-checked the vma bounds against the address. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) [Port to 4.12 kernel] [Build depends on CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT] [Introduce vm_write_* inline function depending on CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT] [Fix lock dependency between mapping->i_mmap_rwsem and vma->vm_sequence by using vm_raw_write* functions] Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour --- include/linux/mm.h | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/mm_types.h | 3 +++ mm/memory.c | 2 ++ mm/mmap.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h index e869adec9023..9c22b4134c5d 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/mm.h @@ -1370,6 +1370,47 @@ static inline void unmap_shared_mapping_range(struct address_space *mapping, unmap_mapping_range(mapping, holebegin, holelen, 0); } +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence); +} +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + int subclass) +{ + write_seqcount_begin_nested(&vma->vm_sequence, subclass); +} +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence); +} +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + raw_write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence); +} +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + raw_write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence); +} +#else +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ +} +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + int subclass) +{ +} +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ +} +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ +} +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ +} +#endif /* CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT */ + extern int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr, void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags); extern int access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h index fd1af6b9591d..34fde7111e88 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h @@ -333,6 +333,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct { struct mempolicy *vm_policy; /* NUMA policy for the VMA */ #endif struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx; +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT + seqcount_t vm_sequence; +#endif } __randomize_layout; struct core_thread { diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index a301b9003200..3cc1a13417cf 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -1503,6 +1503,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, unsigned long next; BUG_ON(addr >= end); + vm_write_begin(vma); tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma); pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr); do { @@ -1512,6 +1513,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, next = zap_p4d_range(tlb, vma, pgd, addr, next, details); } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end); tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma); + vm_write_end(vma); } diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index 4bb038e7984b..671940b72696 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -558,6 +558,10 @@ void __vma_link_rb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, else mm->highest_vm_end = vm_end_gap(vma); +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT + seqcount_init(&vma->vm_sequence); +#endif + /* * vma->vm_prev wasn't known when we followed the rbtree to find the * correct insertion point for that vma. As a result, we could not @@ -692,6 +696,30 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, long adjust_next = 0; int remove_next = 0; + /* + * Why using vm_raw_write*() functions here to avoid lockdep's warning ? + * + * Locked is complaining about a theoretical lock dependency, involving + * 3 locks: + * mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> vma->vm_sequence --> fs_reclaim + * + * Here are the major path leading to this dependency : + * 1. __vma_adjust() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> i_mmap_rwsem + * 2. move_vmap() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> fs_reclaim + * 3. __alloc_pages_nodemask() fs_reclaim -> i_mmap_rwsem + * 4. unmap_mapping_range() i_mmap_rwsem -> vm_sequence + * + * So there is no way to solve this easily, especially because in + * unmap_mapping_range() the i_mmap_rwsem is grab while the impacted + * VMAs are not yet known. + * However, the way the vm_seq is used is guarantying that we will + * never block on it since we just check for its value and never wait + * for it to move, see vma_has_changed() and handle_speculative_fault(). + */ + vm_raw_write_begin(vma); + if (next) + vm_raw_write_begin(next); + if (next && !insert) { struct vm_area_struct *exporter = NULL, *importer = NULL; @@ -902,6 +930,7 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, anon_vma_merge(vma, next); mm->map_count--; mpol_put(vma_policy(next)); + vm_raw_write_end(next); kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, next); /* * In mprotect's case 6 (see comments on vma_merge), @@ -916,6 +945,8 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, * "vma->vm_next" gap must be updated. */ next = vma->vm_next; + if (next) + vm_raw_write_begin(next); } else { /* * For the scope of the comment "next" and @@ -962,6 +993,10 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, if (insert && file) uprobe_mmap(insert); + if (next && next != vma) + vm_raw_write_end(next); + vm_raw_write_end(vma); + validate_mm(mm); return 0; -- 2.7.4