Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1042825wrg; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:21:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2269a3cNRBhsy2+GqYRqSfa6JftNhZs8cQlGNBWCwyPrzwe8rrg5PvP5uGen4AbVttly2QRI X-Received: by 10.98.205.14 with SMTP id o14mr6995232pfg.42.1518808867784; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:21:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518808867; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BY5vuhPd9aGjoQZ949JFpu1OEfjMq8gaLbrQipla3ouAAFW7DpiGtH8yKKJ8izs6qa a/jp1+rXqfCin1uDN0yEPzbpgmvOVHDZFoPQs1bfDy3d6JJWTdtAOWJPDpbDLwq+NzG4 +1QjgekVWKHsYprX0A7422wDKzaFEPL6xBbXzsn2ad2npH99OuAId0K19FmqNpfBK6AG HPwrmVFj53O3WHL81bxZJgLVT6OUOgobwk7wcNOAVATJq7hvxR5lQFtmF7/38z81PAmA Y4KoU5le/ucsI5oN+K9EHoFsSUxbYBY+geSwR4CsH3RwwiwSSlBvpkQXJ2Lc1Ex0QgAZ qp3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dmarc-filter:arc-authentication-results; bh=6e+CEdA41mB7Ks7MT0beSAoQsmG/03KBHnuvgEHgOdg=; b=K0ieez6FfDrLSEzCqdb3HBhKsbhDLdhOlQryHTmBKLeqy59rPzAdn1v9Yvj6WBgdnv kTB25xzyoIWWphVfqV0u6NWb8ghrh4hKlY9C+TiVpYPMlBt6Cwdup/N9huWvDZC2+esE PKeRVptX61gVDeCL9EYls2J0zgasJll85UReYSwdCYBrdNdPl2mscPP9pfRG48mErAqW p6dutSE2x4Rre7K7AiKEY+aB33PPixWiFwrEluCtufj5ULdE8DWAo85LkL7dx+wxxs9z eAxGPpWAO3gtlsqC2/pbh0gSXuWoUrtT10aGj8tui1MfiLN8MGKKyySQUIhGQ7S3Q0+P 9UqA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s2si4505030pgo.362.2018.02.16.11.20.53; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1162134AbeBPRgc (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:36:32 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39826 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752448AbeBPRgb (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:36:31 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-172-100-180-131.stny.res.rr.com [172.100.180.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87ADF21104; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:36:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 87ADF21104 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=rostedt@goodmis.org Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:36:29 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: changbin.du@intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Documentation: convert trace/ftrace-design.txt to rst format Message-ID: <20180216123629.5ac2b373@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20180216054952.78718f09@lwn.net> References: <1518750739-12514-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com> <1518750739-12514-3-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com> <20180215225705.58984492@vmware.local.home> <20180216054952.78718f09@lwn.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:49:52 -0700 Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 22:57:05 -0500 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > This document is out of date, and I rather have it updated before we > > make it more "available" elsewhere. > > Imagine that, an out-of-date doc in the kernel :) > > Seriously, though, I'd argue that (1) it's already highly available, and > (2) it's useful now. And (3) who knows when that update will happen? > Unless we have reason to believe that a new version is waiting on the > wings, I don't really see why we would want to delay this work. Actually, some of these documents I was thinking of labeling as "obsolete" or simply removing them. The ftrace-design one is about how to port ftrace to other architectures, and I already had to correct people that based their work on it. Yeah, I really need to get some time to update them, but like everyone else, that's just the 90th thing I have to do. -- Steve