Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1045992wrg; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:24:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225P0YawL0sWmYyl50KLzlxBoIW9ZfpoPgYzPBFI/htCXAj5LdbzP+GYJc32AMpXOoccqeNi X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:758d:: with SMTP id j13-v6mr6941724pll.196.1518809088187; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:24:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518809088; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BgNDV5HTZd8vCfn658+Mjo318+cW85BrzxskvjPbnwWBqNPcKQR1REGRgLGpP4GZrV ieOKzxY9Wv1FeNr+k4C3doGBwR5kBT6TozJdrRBL44Al3IsCK/OlqkQIokcDV8dX3cRl jUcAV5ybVeaId0I466acPoyaGTJxiRws12gfXX8pqencgkgnEtQnyUYFSkHpLAoU50tT KCNhIeO+B4Hbmn/tavXFtQ4JC4uzlNXdq841zGecwe/yE7/sxb37ucxtWF6qFARIsP6/ 5WJtPsjedyy2FFCEBXPEMPCAyH725vHcbysYQSe355VAEJBTHcrsGY5YaKv0SZNho4TM fuxg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=1xjmbNdznKOvRdCNO+vQct77bwwiVTb6wiokSH2QeUY=; b=R1Pl8RUpQgFo3Ag7qRTGJw11o0hiLX0etOI5TLtULqc0s+YbR/UNMAixu8uglpDM4l qjBS6O9Cz6kugPxcx7KtXsn5Q/7xHz94nhFNDvMOhizafwke6YHydvTbmRc3Oz4vEMBB wx4yVD4nQHsIRN4UbbpOlyT+KqeJDFdbKHjJlbZVmPzIx03MD9dcGFnpESveKglWlMrZ VTzqVTk1nRAl76kkRJ8VoQeX+2rCoPW4K0MKmFu2lTaqYpeqoX5t7qfeSjVDOPhHZCBx 00naBRo/4BbBVQGWrRytgovUY0Zhttn9d0Jq3LQ8rG1HOdZT265INSVP0kOLi4s4lrwa 0Bmg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l4si211831pgc.586.2018.02.16.11.24.33; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:24:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752890AbeBPTGK (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:06:10 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49186 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752826AbeBPTGJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:06:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [37.173.12.47]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7549110C; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:50:59 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Liam Mark Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Sumit Semwal , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: android: ion: Initialize dma_address of new sg list Message-ID: <20180216185059.GC9616@kroah.com> References: <20180216162353.GA13019@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 09:57:12AM -0800, Liam Mark wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 10:16:56PM -0800, Liam Mark wrote: > > > Fix the dup_sg_table function to initialize the dma_address of the new > > > sg list entries instead of the source dma_address entries. > > > > > > Fixes: 17fd283f3870 ("staging: android: ion: Duplicate sg_table") > > > > So this should be sent to the stable trees as well, right? > > > > Please add that when you resend... > > My understanding was that I should only send this to the stable branch if > it fixes a real bug. > > Both myself and Laura can't see any actual problems that result from this > issue, the change is more to help future proof the code. > > My commit message wasn't clear about this and could have mislead people > into thinking there was a bug. > I will update the commit message to make it clear that this issue doesn't > currently result in any problem. > > Do you still want me to send it to the stable trees? If it's not a bugfix, no need to. But please clean up your changelog text as it implies that it is a bugfix... thanks, greg k-h