Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1077814wrg; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:02:40 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2271ri+EjUNCXiWttLvqtkbO9K5bwZ3N9eCLoCtAamjB+8ILrJsW9vR1WaZbr0jSrs1EYCw4 X-Received: by 10.98.224.24 with SMTP id f24mr7030472pfh.157.1518811360862; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:02:40 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518811360; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yiZrxDgF4tolip6td/67qoJkVm0jZ7Qy8U3tC6RweU72D7XdU3YMlgbKmyum1IsDnq KDfBa/J6ZlcpG5f6FNgDtiowPaLCNChx+Q9xHzyChUu9HImot/TO23V/0Cn/8uMIm4nl 7J6PyCci3GK/Yb4v+/U8Ty45Zm/zHn7dhjM4w09Y8Qy5xVz8uQUSjzFSI6EmacNpXacu xJ4+lMvwliKWKA0tpIpMIIhUUzwauA1yr5HoDaRuXHTBiypCVO9SyXR9zmEKGqtKn0SV ottqGS1je7+LpTqNmuZDv/IE6H5/HvnxRkSCsZ5YHbH9DuZI8Kq1j4yOC3NmPubpAzBF 3MUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:cc:references:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=qkd+LY5Zni4EFe0fSdmco+wd+Hirh1c6nTakH9dF3v0=; b=MTocnIsfbjud5yVRUtwnxCzjAAhO3Sf4pbGh6nI5t8OoFMt4OyFIZFHMS7h5Ga9DO2 MDBeT5PtBeP+CkV1PSniO9+ndAONlHy/vOAWgZzuV6Xrm2ScO6d77QgHcj+fbDK6GZCb xdhMBVhR8oxeoTVFIxhEwoc+GUZvpJgT/7t1qmQ6mlDJnKg/zVutMVtXINKrtJWjRqE7 TOAKjas8Sal03sF9Uy2sFsS1168xiuMW/KRcVfCjJtv59vNcBZsOBfNsj89wbDZCVK+0 XasJl0Ddrv2XbS4RNIgEJOZ+5ugP/URIhy1AL+qT3TEwTgUx3DeeC9KEfhIeHEXIH/GU 8bsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b5si4314165pgv.317.2018.02.16.12.02.14; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:02:40 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750857AbeBPUAl (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:00:41 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:35753 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750727AbeBPUAk (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:00:40 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2018 12:00:39 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,520,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="18742395" Received: from ray.jf.intel.com (HELO [10.7.201.20]) ([10.7.201.20]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2018 12:00:39 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/mm: introduce __PAGE_KERNEL_GLOBAL To: Nadav Amit References: <20180215132053.6C9B48C8@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20180215132055.F341C31E@viggo.jf.intel.com> <0f8abc68-1092-1bae-d244-1adbbee455f9@linux.intel.com> <4542D3AE-6A4F-45AD-AD70-8DFA9503071A@gmail.com> Cc: LKML , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" , Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , keescook@google.com, Hugh Dickins , Juergen Gross , x86@kernel.org From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <9f77b568-d86c-47db-f7a3-ddb931f33af0@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:00:38 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4542D3AE-6A4F-45AD-AD70-8DFA9503071A@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/16/2018 11:54 AM, Nadav Amit wrote: >> But I don't really want to hide that gunk in a macro like that. It >> might make more sense as a static inline. I'll give that a shot and resent. > Since determining whether PTI is on is done in several places in the kernel, > maybe there should a single function to determine whether PTI is on, > something like: > > static inline bool is_pti_on(void) > { > return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PAGE_TABLE_ISOLATION) && > static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI); > } We should be able to do it with disabled-features.h and the X86_FEATURE bit. I'll look into it.