Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp2128652wrg; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:57:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227TptpSwoU0JZKGhYuhXiJmHksTqhjX472oLxS9YrgOXPgjJuSnEjSp+MPRHnr4YHxtvy/O X-Received: by 10.101.80.69 with SMTP id k5mr8474110pgo.433.1518901047318; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:57:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1518901047; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=o33i3vyZFtNSztMAaVOlHg2WQCLrw3XgS+dhF0iKeP7/VNYHozkOCohDxksvMHMJWZ adykzbNlAme0lOVmKh0n3eAwm35CkAi5OpKs/TDtcJ71i5O0pedt/4SbyuUZB73ysQzn vwwlC+r9O0ostILT/hsPkYoCLtAurntIM3Da4KHxWu0ZUUK1z0eC4tOxYX/BX1hoeoz5 VssPrah0hQ6Wcbpohvgp91gaVYm3OxSlPO1qYY9UhiGMcmyvm2b0kfmccwWTO4VhBO6r PbzG0vpmRLQaCubPx30N4DY4xqUiygY/+wDgBtMcUnPMI7pH+3dxIWlrkVMxuv81Gg46 49fw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:arc-authentication-results; bh=5d3yyPBKnwCs5LhoXRYWs8ZKVf2AI5vVQ1cFS6nnqVc=; b=i7l6Zx6v7gFT586hua6Xi4mL9bVNSgdVGJ9xb75bBx+c/AJ6AzGq2VP+H/tXtO7xTg aYvT4E8UA71u3q0yz2HLIvkF2n/sMVjwAxIuXQRzJY9ZF/yFsmdX8F2lGqBiO+ir3lPc RmyJX5bZWvktj3NYE5k6pW4u3n0VwRGaR8iyp5pd33BGLYRnmy/l58AthaRNVEWA2AiA SUQg1K+cUmZannyvWj2yQayUCcLfx3Xh9IWYUsU/8y1C28SDH88GG1ak9KX9pLp2PHyb oleuoJDkok/zZcXbWEShIyrYUsed7nqXT4fYoUb/9U9QU7ELs+oy304A+M4RLcBI9dAy imIw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t11-v6si4197914plr.411.2018.02.17.12.57.12; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:57:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751266AbeBQUIn (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:08:43 -0500 Received: from g2t2353.austin.hpe.com ([15.233.44.26]:19084 "EHLO g2t2353.austin.hpe.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751131AbeBQUIm (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:08:42 -0500 Received: from g2t2360.austin.hpecorp.net (g2t2360.austin.hpecorp.net [16.196.225.135]) by g2t2353.austin.hpe.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F806D; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net (anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net [10.34.81.6]) by g2t2360.austin.hpecorp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937A040; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:08:41 -0700 From: Jerry Hoemann To: Guenter Roeck Cc: wim@linux-watchdog.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rwright@hpe.com, maurice.a.saldivar@hpe.com, mingo@kernel.org, marcus.folkesson@gmail.com Subject: Re: [v3,06/11] watchdog/hpwdt: Select WATCHDOG_CORE Message-ID: <20180217200841.GB27788@anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net> Reply-To: Jerry.Hoemann@hpe.com References: <20180215234400.5022-7-jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> <20180217162130.GA30748@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180217162130.GA30748@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 08:21:30AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 04:43:55PM -0700, Jerry Hoemann wrote: > > Update Kconfig file to show that hpwdt now selects WATCHDOG_CORE. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jerry Hoemann > > At this point, WATCHDOG_CORE is not required. This patch should > be merged with the next patch, which adds the requirement. > > Since it appears that you insist on having it as separate patch, > deferring to Wim. > I have no objection to squashing these two commits once we have agreed upon the actual changes being made. I re-ordered to address the bisectability question, but kept them separate as it is a little bit easier for me to rework patches if the patch contains only a single file. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett Packard Enterprise -----------------------------------------------------------------------------