Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 19 Feb 2018 09:08:46 +0100
From:   Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>, kbuild-all@01.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
        bart.vanassche@wdc.com, axboe@kernel.dk, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
        tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] lib/scatterlist: Add SG_CHAIN and SG_END macros for
 LSB encodings
Message-ID: <20180219080846.xnmyt62lzzqybf75@linux-x5ow.site>
References: <20180215033356.6978-1-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <201802180359.yuetSevh%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
 <c407c32f-a7b6-06c5-4a03-109445e27427@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <c407c32f-a7b6-06c5-4a03-109445e27427@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 09:42:29AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> SG_END is already defined in a driver. Hence shall we change back
> 'SG_END' definition as 'SG_EMARK' or any other suggestions ?

Yes something like this.
-- 
Johannes Thumshirn                                          Storage
jthumshirn@suse.de                                +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg
GF: Felix Imend?rffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG N?rnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850