Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp3564796wrg; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:07:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226NJtLn/98EQ/GRimW0LGxibJ9K9sl8C+yx1g06RKPYpPsJSCDBEDkMZEveFn98b5oJnvWI X-Received: by 10.101.86.1 with SMTP id l1mr11985151pgs.140.1519034820986; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:07:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519034820; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cXC32HCtDBaxDvvu3RsZOqjVb4Px/SJNDU/jBnBWYluPoONu1eAbe4XH6tyNSGTUlR 4H6LMvDPlNyXeWM6rN7ncMjMmJOusr8diRJ85JzVf0edkCUgSsek04gpf9mxNLRwJ8KG SUdhTXkZMqqafvev5CFbdoieNrHPyonN6p91Qxm1UNekqSXs8ZdaP3bUNCRr2y8k9Qrx HXE9CpEzUj4hduHZLCE2ZySVRS++rcElAOpXIR95awOgifEM2vDnzu7856nznuhuKaCC WHMNov/qLqyuOfTnTRQmb65Qy2xXtSiyHArFclPHVXzyft9+o8k3lTeBF96jt0xcX5Fr 2YpA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=SPC00nc0wJNoggUNnsb1JBG5dynpClCczFFObF/VcZk=; b=F/yjBjRoAF49KyoqCp0OIUcYdAhEEr0rjpYnto3nPqPb6OsDrIuJnHjiQAiEFMJDiz hHlvMapSLYjfp/llD7WDaNWPjUflA4E/Fb7azGJRnkvPdclSpsKz+8ktLLf8lh5RWFRv 6br+3Y60Ezqa74HW/ZHiz7pgOzAWw0v7uUXRlqAf/BpaqNfDpBCJ3q+EZpYWtx9vmWge KURRCUz4aLA6tDYnbje1toUhxjFog/KshxxvhadGA5QxGz2ovqKe3mp5ns4g4FDwprxS bA4EipnO8CHl2vbwm7m/18eYHwvPvlsLa5fBPKA6EMhmNhkLWqdyY9xHsXiVsG1yjGzY Xbvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ewQpdo2v; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w3si5963127pgq.415.2018.02.19.02.06.46; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ewQpdo2v; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752230AbeBSKGC (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 05:06:02 -0500 Received: from mail-pl0-f47.google.com ([209.85.160.47]:40876 "EHLO mail-pl0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752370AbeBSKGA (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 05:06:00 -0500 Received: by mail-pl0-f47.google.com with SMTP id g18so5373273plo.7 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:06:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SPC00nc0wJNoggUNnsb1JBG5dynpClCczFFObF/VcZk=; b=ewQpdo2vNMAhKTR6fHjLgMiGJb6MlZjHI5zyTJklj9Mu7sosMwXBLPUYDvbpFsGAQq lBN1Q1cKa9ePNeNqJFvuQI1EuwN3irHnl7ojMB+BtG+yWNg25WsOUvh0AJUehBAf5pB9 2Sd1Gh6wGqMaBKRG8aFLHd/uXy0p7xnw8OtOjhezI2UlJ7QuGJjsgcSzD7yLrHM5/8gp 48WEW28ToWhCk6FGJ+lhEyPzTTGa0CLeNOrl8Hh2NpyDKeXSQpxhQ+LCO52XJoDNwNc/ VYFhlV4VWtQwXKxcDwRBGRghQZ+X+jWAdi3oMKqMPYg3DutGWqx/FNo/3h860UFq3VH3 9Jrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SPC00nc0wJNoggUNnsb1JBG5dynpClCczFFObF/VcZk=; b=nrfjMoPaXqAb4frAOkgI3pPZOPqa/pZhBJXb4zGCS9EYB0Oe/7VizHFrIBMTPg+jf0 xxZH+RwZGrFU8VChnanQM7BYSFNBjBv9yrW2vgZQ9N6SisPpj6pnZ7I/YOFX2TKutyv+ AsvHukKqMdnCECXq3dBIFdXIn6AlRZkBoS/vpyvgj3RU7oWdrmLsqLgPIQNVVYtd92Xy XxYa6WuefSCTcLsg0/mV62kp4etZakSZ7sGnrP79GtrfHbCiIradYbDVTHK0MGnyAwmn YnDQkdLd/ZWwhvDso337eWOYF1ZplapgZL9JKYBwT6cQhb+O9J8GvbrBKd2JD9pgVMsD VKEg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAvZllB22pvwp/9HL96jOdotCxSCP1woVJJZfoUGs19vphp7pLM BGDbFEZgJmHo9NGQe11nc2JBzFGFu65GvsJ6UhllUg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7587:: with SMTP id j7-v6mr7006926pll.135.1519034758759; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:05:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.140.151 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:05:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20180219072243.vk7ow4gdpqhz5gbp@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <001a1141ba9ea381f70565057687@google.com> <20180219072243.vk7ow4gdpqhz5gbp@gauss3.secunet.de> From: Dmitry Vyukov Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:05:38 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: INFO: rcu detected stall in xfrm_confirm_neigh To: Steffen Klassert Cc: syzbot , dzickus@redhat.com, Greg Kroah-Hartman , "H. Peter Anvin" , Kate Stewart , LKML , Ingo Molnar , npiggin@gmail.com, Philippe Ombredanne , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, Thomas Gleixner , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Herbert Xu , David Miller , netdev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Steffen Klassert wrote: >> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> syzbot hit the following crash on net-next commit >> >> 9515a2e082f91457db0ecff4b65371d0fb5d9aad (Thu Jan 25 03:37:38 2018 +0000) >> >> net/ipv4: Allow send to local broadcast from a socket bound to a VRF >> >> >> >> So far this crash happened 6 times on net-next. >> >> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this crash yet. >> >> Raw console output is attached. >> >> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620 >> >> .config is attached. >> > >> > >> > +xfrm maintainers >> >> Here is a C repro: >> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/dvyukov/92c67ba9afaaa960bcfbdc6ef549ac10/raw/786f9221c1d707c7f4a15effcb1d5997dd4f8638/gistfile1.txt > > Seems like syzbot does not know about this reproducer. > > I've send a patch to test and got this as the reply: > > This crash does not have a reproducer. I cannot test it. Yes, it does not know about the reproducer. I've extracted it manually, these hangs are sometimes hard to reproduce. For syzbot this bug does not have a reproducer. Have you tried to run the reproducer? For me it reproduced the bug quite reliably.