Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp3565627wrg; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:07:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225yaXHjewW5p+gx03fF78qsAmSR3Qo1pKs6XGBlbABSbDq4JTcgv1kKAjMoCQ6J+prwr1Ev X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:22e:: with SMTP id 43-v6mr13861697plc.384.1519034874397; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:07:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519034874; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=otxsgop19tjYqPkEzxiiWaEHsHbQQESGVULL1BVpuZb7hW76eIzFjL2DGZZZcQWRD1 2QRJeoyNL6OkLw93FulSqSu6wsYXmbyYHqJA/d3lIMvhg8C8/e6lPwVTk82Wv+RzEv0U x+kcYZIP3J/zGFpH5dT5Q6sNVKD/9PytvAu350q8LoCO7jojEZnFD0nPQ9yOP6QHexaR lIkqrG+xM/oWdytAd17Vxzcuy3f6iz9L0xtEyR6eMy0igNYjKdaMI9P34hXOSya74onl gLc7RHzj6h2OpeXurYMM9+yztCRU66QJl3PLS8A6YL05zcrcs5GIqXr/gouh0KedPrzt 9kvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :organization:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=QGvkoZhQsVtuX7y497gh62WKYyy9n9XybULn5VMDy+4=; b=OKlc5zeRmPMbWrhDrTrl5Y5ZFQGMSmsFQugD9PS5cGc8YF5qarFv0/qi6uOSJsPDs5 nTF0ezHGlB778OGG5EQliPXQPG12c/J6OL5V1gY4865kbFzS2izBbX6Rx3KJ48Q1IPzB Jqdq9Aaee9OHH5B2Wtd3Hh7/e5If2hw5EU/DOzEgH0V5uHYRdn55kKJ8G9UEMqjyjsj5 EXL/dWFZlbHGYwtUZWnsuUN9CdGQm4zYiCELnXAeLQFQ4asxX1c48aXDOB84qONmUCVG PWtKyutZHGAOTC5seJxgUCm41TGcUYzDReL7lRbRdtihclWH8SaRAf67wI/YpVyQgDJ6 bRLQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 123si3166411pfg.361.2018.02.19.02.07.39; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 02:07:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752447AbeBSKFr (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 05:05:47 -0500 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:5099 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752162AbeBSKFq (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Feb 2018 05:05:46 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Feb 2018 02:05:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,534,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="31887131" Received: from tkahrman-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.33.108]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Feb 2018 02:05:41 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Jonathan Corbet , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tom Saeger , Joonas Lahtinen , Matthew Wilcox , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie , Rodrigo Vivi , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Add support for in-line nested struct comments In-Reply-To: <20180218170334.711d50e2@lwn.net> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20180218170334.711d50e2@lwn.net> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 12:05:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87371xb8gb.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 18 Feb 2018, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:48:14 -0200 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> his series fix two bugs at kernel-doc.rst examples and add support >> for in-line nested struct comments. >> >> It also converts one documentation at intel_dpio_phy to use it, >> in order to give a practical example about how to use it. > > OK, I've applied everything but the last patch, which I assume will go > through the DRM tree. I was going to reference the kernel-doc commit while applying patch 6, but I can't find the others. I guess applied literally meant just applied, not pushed... ;) BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center