Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S275231AbTHAOnX (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:43:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275233AbTHAOnX (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:43:23 -0400 Received: from dsl081-067-005.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.67.5]:49610 "EHLO renegade") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S275231AbTHAOnT (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:43:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 07:43:12 -0700 From: Zack Brown To: Marx Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: ptrace or procfs for gdb? Message-ID: <20030801144312.GN6693@renegade> References: <000801c35832$a423e210$3cbd5ada@karl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000801c35832$a423e210$3cbd5ada@karl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 682 Lines: 24 Hi Marx, The linux-kernel mailing list is the best place for these kinds of questions. (CCed) Good luck, Zack On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 09:41:40PM +0800, Marx wrote: > I look over your "kernel Traffic". > Now, May I discuss something about procfs with you? > > Why does Linux support gdb with ptrace, not procfs? > > I've developed debugger for servel years,I prefer procfs rather than > ptrace. -- Zack Brown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/