Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270805AbTHAO7a (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:59:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S275229AbTHAO7a (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:59:30 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:28107 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270805AbTHAO73 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Aug 2003 10:59:29 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: Disk speed differences under 2.6.0 Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:55:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E570185F3CF@EXA-ATLANTA.se.lsil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OJLAKOnfzSBcCqGkz6TRUbToieg= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 555 Lines: 10 "Gordon Larsen" writes: > My apologies if this has already been discussed - but has anyone noticed > disk I/O speed differences under 2.6.0 as compared to 2.4.20? My system has It has been discussed. The solution is "hdparm -a 512 /dev/...". -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru@users.sf.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/