Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1120779wrg; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:46:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224Q+ZLw09/gqU60FHK4gXSm+klwze5gfSMvUfdPaFo8vhRtfGFzu4DrbbTcXE35zRdHkZii X-Received: by 10.98.233.21 with SMTP id j21mr974992pfh.123.1519163163529; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:46:03 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519163163; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RFSvlcXZ0kd/pQGI7xIV7toIAudgBKjiH1jWrjBOJaGkQWiq/IwlTDdYi++WN7GNd6 ehtxXyYG1r/diZ6rNN3cIn4wotxBgHzQsUPPUs0eIisbONwSpnklir2i6iYLS7L9EixM VXDlUkSREKebaH3fw8xmUR648jKqPCpbdGm+gJab9G2OBb2sDimC/WbK99d8pP7aZ21X DP+6YftWxQmtRMVSiiq1oy1WiDjnaoCSvVkl7SYPmISoOXXhuE8c4zKwLHgphnfYiLEy ckeh9uBMkTnrtjKGgWpdwpUzvi4Ci5AklRS3NkbMRIPVMpIjLzOtw8LMmYVKMRvKGb/p KaGA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=3xAf+SCVNpot8wTxMnMDc/bl0rgbp54a+M20nZAPFmw=; b=pvLVlgAEUOpiIPitLpbZcNHig/qD5VOTmbijOiFL6sHQEBM6d8kgQ6fJ2gsgGEvdh8 8iUqntpy/rZXbmEC3SdibGnQsAstWgxHAyo3h2oJupet5WGUDchae6I9gIA20aIfsyVW FGMVwFtqUpar5CMTciK2XaQCV+BLSUNCT85Xq6g/PjJKjqQGjujb6ri4bMMO7ObtjC14 nSyp1KYo9szfwUtGCA8EqxiZMRmnHlCwCBCkd2AkFPBusIKaepaMgwBsOF3phAL3TqNs NWyOGrTqeQpFjdAq4EhMZw/HYANIX3Ipq8BkBztSk1/1Btrmli2lhR3LTjvW0wpFfwaZ MgKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k195si663462pga.68.2018.02.20.13.45.49; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751533AbeBTVon (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:44:43 -0500 Received: from www62.your-server.de ([213.133.104.62]:40702 "EHLO www62.your-server.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751402AbeBTVoi (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:44:38 -0500 Received: from [62.202.221.135] (helo=linux.home) by www62.your-server.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoFiA-0002p4-JV; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:44:30 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: hide a possibly unused variable To: Arnd Bergmann , Alexei Starovoitov , "David S. Miller" Cc: John Fastabend , Lawrence Brakmo , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180220211658.2653840-1-arnd@arndb.de> From: Daniel Borkmann Message-ID: <824bfc29-d6e8-9d7d-9307-79bf0097ce8e@iogearbox.net> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 22:44:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180220211658.2653840-1-arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-Sender: daniel@iogearbox.net X-Virus-Scanned: Clear (ClamAV 0.99.3/24333/Tue Feb 20 18:20:41 2018) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On 02/20/2018 10:16 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The only user of this variable is inside of an #ifdef, causing > a warning without CONFIG_INET: > > net/core/filter.c: In function '____bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set': > net/core/filter.c:3382:6: error: unused variable 'val' [-Werror=unused-variable] > int val = argval & BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS; > > This adds the same #ifdef around the declaration. > > Fixes: b13d88072172 ("bpf: Adds field bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags to tcp_sock") > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > net/core/filter.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c > index 08ab4c65a998..c3dc6d60b4bb 100644 > --- a/net/core/filter.c > +++ b/net/core/filter.c > @@ -3379,7 +3379,9 @@ BPF_CALL_2(bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock, > int, argval) > { > struct sock *sk = bpf_sock->sk; > +#ifdef CONFIG_INET > int val = argval & BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS; > +#endif Looks good, thanks for the fix! Could you move the existing '#ifdef CONFIG_INET' to the beginning of the function given the only error in case of !CONFIG_INET is -EINVAL anyway? That would at least not increase the ifdef ugliness further. Thanks a lot, Daniel > if (!sk_fullsock(sk)) > return -EINVAL; >