Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1484wrg; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:38:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225cyXn4vCwpt9/86fyKv38cpq3xhDdj/g1hWXA3KfU5xO2vOLScM6Lkd9jaQR/eF8QjvG4i X-Received: by 10.99.126.22 with SMTP id z22mr947718pgc.131.1519166300858; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:38:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519166300; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hxNMxwcDmO1aq03ik5+4h/NH9qZada9dBnQnxM1ubVXDHTY55QCiXmSWp6lVEQyYoS FyX9GvGWPlvbiKO2tq/jGD0KAywyNNGZddrZE3ePea9PbwEN99m+Sd5Id0BMYc6mVrVS yWh2lztRl+kFzFrqIlmk8zvKzy+2jAOI5GyzKL3Yr2lsxEeElBfC9qhWf1u819yPSOga x2xwbghvHkX7tec03LwLzaPT+RdehL+KnE7VGOzVocSzZi2THP+jPnvm/Bm4UhScx6Xx KknvIhlnL+MC4NfxZHtzuebeiR83ckm4+53IBU77DHw6b5RIJq++AeTtUCU5FG68QnWv Zq6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=LsZ5XBC+lOX08rgohSs3baCE5Rpp5kznijls2Cw4lxY=; b=P9vF5SqDz83HDrhYslagz5Bi/hBfmJlRAuAvHRem46iyNdwAb/4k4Dlv5GNs3z0hiE G1NsUPaB2LWrJnD+Mo9fKCIv2q/r4zoYLfIEbSpIRC8w/XGKjUDlJJTUpZuKMAcet2nz fRCUGVwcwQJeLlLQWJsD2Ro7VyhrAa5MGwdR5JD6dg4vf+0GpVmFDxYiSPBoN/G6wb1C Gl5M0grpg2VaMeHJAAnlbBc2C4VYKve4uHuUHrpx32Dw72JgTsVDBfBqfST4JhhuQx1S 8wRNQQYBY5W3QWnbb3V5kNQYRXsCGbK/yvO+857dASWarUu1GvfG895VzcuUCm/zE4pd tvYg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=uKIvXOdp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 141si13187523pfz.106.2018.02.20.14.38.06; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:38:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=uKIvXOdp; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751608AbeBTWhO (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:37:14 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:46578 "EHLO mail-pf0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751270AbeBTWhM (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:37:12 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f169.google.com with SMTP id z24so4044681pfh.13 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:37:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LsZ5XBC+lOX08rgohSs3baCE5Rpp5kznijls2Cw4lxY=; b=uKIvXOdpO1VRvxV4MDt4REtaKTCSD2fnixeTgLcb2oEY9uCGcJdxOtzdyDwwqBiX5w LDWK1h+uPJGd2GahqetHMX8+HXq9HZUiQdZA3+QoBngXNyapxTWd4nKTENzWZDTKXQyx oW1ciFKiXct2rZRu7/SNEtz1PgnHboJiayfbZquFQulqOB7x6oqGX6Mh2oq/h7Pabj82 Qd2luzseMEenlUtsAPr+yvoT+X2m/VS+AGzqTgDCdGubyGdS3hURhHtM7xHzWZmYteRD bZI4DwenL0HnGBpSFT65jXp5NMwu0/cazqtXB1as0e1BmcPeyPQzizGUfDoGhI2bDNLD H6gA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LsZ5XBC+lOX08rgohSs3baCE5Rpp5kznijls2Cw4lxY=; b=CFfHcWYsjhMZdgbS0EADeW3uDw/A+Ekq/IV4y5tGW4dUoPXkcUTr60VR7NtoDF1W4R 5fV60fW432+vtEBMshFrjxZXUZo8CSPNxU1jLTfux3Kxxjgfk6UEXewq1ZX1KwQkfC1r G4qaKDXMxNm4D5UEfULlmseogf2sOM8WrsWLthAPzAslzimlPbkPZtx+RZd6xHS/KcYL Qg5SxQIbFX1G6dhBzds1VAC/mIgQHbO6wJZql/+OjZ+2M6fQkagFI+NpsIKX1a+CVEgK RsmtLk3Ms/WDGYuPpzh1vWVPNM451Iv8Cr9ydnXAZU8q2SVVWUCz4UMHwPQOxIZY4jwF uzNA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDK71jxqNRKsnO3oZ8Q4uiTd5lWYZpJ1nxytYcVKgQakNxixJwI 47VoN2/CxEMRnPVlc7dcWZYC5g== X-Received: by 10.101.67.2 with SMTP id j2mr914562pgq.159.1519166231931; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:37:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:d443:4600:c86e:3c3d:5d5d:bb2a? ([2605:e000:d443:4600:c86e:3c3d:5d5d:bb2a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f5sm18139950pgo.58.2018.02.20.14.37.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:37:10 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk: optimization for classic polling To: Peter Zijlstra , Nitesh Shetty Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, joshi.k@samsung.com References: <3578876466-3733-1-git-send-email-nj.shetty@samsung.com> <20180220132137.GG25314@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: <35a2d52e-dd40-d130-85d9-5f3ffe0d28af@kernel.dk> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:37:07 -1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180220132137.GG25314@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/20/18 3:21 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2083 at 09:51:06AM +0530, Nitesh Shetty wrote: >> This removes the dependency on interrupts to wake up task. Set task >> state as TASK_RUNNING, if need_resched() returns true, >> while polling for IO completion. >> Earlier, polling task used to sleep, relying on interrupt to wake it up. >> This made some IO take very long when interrupt-coalescing is enabled in >> NVMe. > > This is a horrible Changelog.. it does not in fact explain why the patch > works or is correct. Yeah, that should have been improved. > Also, set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING) is dodgy (similarly in > __blk_mq_poll), why do you need that memory barrier? I pointed that out in the review, and v2 fixed it. v2 is the one that got merged. -- Jens Axboe