Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269950AbTHBRdw (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2003 13:33:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269958AbTHBRdw (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2003 13:33:52 -0400 Received: from dsl-gte-19434.linkline.com ([64.30.195.78]:53636 "EHLO server") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269950AbTHBRdt (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Aug 2003 13:33:49 -0400 Message-ID: <002101c3591c$3a85f600$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> From: "Jim Gifford" To: "Marcelo Tosatti" Cc: "Andrea Arcangeli" , "lkml" References: <042801c3472c$f4539f80$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <06e301c347c7$2a779590$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <002b01c347e9$36a04110$f300a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <001801c348a0$9dab91e0$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <008701c34a29$caabb0f0$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <20030719172103.GA1971@x30.local> <018101c34f4d$430d5850$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <005a01c34fed$fea51120$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <012d01c35066$2c56d400$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre5 deadlock Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2003 10:33:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2341 Lines: 75 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marcelo Tosatti" To: "Jim Gifford" Cc: "Andrea Arcangeli" ; "lkml" Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 10:00 AM Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre5 deadlock > > > On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Jim Gifford wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Marcelo Tosatti" > > To: "Jim Gifford" > > Cc: "Andrea Arcangeli" ; "lkml" > > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:53 AM > > Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre5 deadlock > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Jim Gifford wrote: > > > > > > > > Lets wait and see what happens without the iptables and dazuko > > modules. > > > > > > > > > Marcelo, > > > > -pre7 seems to be working ok. Do you want me to enable the dazuko > > thing > > > > again to see if it's the cause, or do you want me to wait a little > > longer to > > > > see what happens. > > > > > > Jim, > > > > > > I prefer if you leave -pre7 running for a while to confirm its stable. > > > > > > > > > > > top - 08:29:37 up 2 days, 13:41, 2 users, load average: 2.33, 2.12, 2.03 > > Tasks: 109 total, 3 running, 106 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > > Cpu0 : 0.3% user, 3.9% system, 95.8% nice, 0.0% idle > > Cpu1 : 1.3% user, 0.6% system, 98.1% nice, 0.0% idle > > Mem: 1033672k total, 639904k used, 393768k free, 160764k buffers > > Swap: 265060k total, 0k used, 265060k free, 187444k cached > > > > Do you want me to do something intensive. I have a compile that I can do > > that takes over 8 hours. > > Jim, > > I guess most of us is already convinced that the lockups were caused by > the non-stock code. > > How long it usually took to lockup before? > Marcelo, I just got back from vacation, pre8 was running with the dazuko module and the program that used it. No down time at all, I will start adding the iptables modules and see which one causes the problems. (I left on Sunday 8am returned on 8pm on Friday). Jim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/