Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 23F8621795
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180221145821.bhoxjndibp3bqfxi@linaro.org>
References: <20180217204433.3095-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
 <20180217204433.3095-6-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20180219203523.rhvbnym7oomzahwi@rob-hp-laptop>
 <20180221145821.bhoxjndibp3bqfxi@linaro.org>
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:52:23 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqK+586zyvsZ0b9i+x78V5NDnAput6Ygfw0qFXu=B-hb9g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] dt-bindings: gpio: Add gpio nodes for Actions S900 SoC
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        =?UTF-8?Q?Andreas_F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>,
        =?UTF-8?B?5YiY54Kc?= <liuwei@actions-semi.com>,
        mp-cs@actions-semi.com, 96boards@ucrobotics.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam
<manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 02:35:23PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 02:14:28AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> > Add gpio nodes for Actions Semi S900 SoC.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
>> > ---
>> >  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt         | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt
>> >
>> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 000000000000..4cd4cb7bfd1b
>> > --- /dev/null
>> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/actions,owl-gpio.txt
>> > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>> > +* Actions Semi OWL GPIO controller bindings
>> > +
>> > +- compatible      : Should be "actions,s900-gpio"
>> > +- reg             : Address and range of the GPIO controller registers.
>> > +- gpio-controller : Marks the device node as a GPIO controller.
>> > +- #gpio-cells     : Should be <2>. The first cell is the gpio number and
>> > +                    the second cell is used to specify optional parameters.
>>
>> Doesn't do interrupts?
>>
> Interrupt support will be added once this base driver gets in.
> One step at a time ;-)

Binding are separate from the driver. Drivers can evolve, but h/w
doesn't (for a given piece of Si). It is not a high bar to list
#interrupt-cells and interrupt-controller.

Rob