Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJRtiPNTZdA_RBUR=Xy6xcstqJUn_KoQtT4t=8jkucFQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGXu5jLc_A1w4FM8FvQHGSPjLfOu80L_vbt_FkcE6+Bh_XMjxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <6be06ce5-87e6-0d9d-55b9-6c70c3578ecf@maciej.szmigiero.name>
 <CAGXu5j+gvH+X-XyqFbY+X0xtG2mQoL5bO7T2_QaeEyr3-Z5eLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFzsiVMFZVwm92N8L=E+YgOG+fpjwxt7rmz72=yMQGz8rg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGXu5jL5C1PHzVKwaQXuMm+jB=Wf0x-AN71_19RtzxvgYHHz3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFxyvr-PVWaOe_PGjej4gGMdfF_Moq0a3A9xZ6gGWAQjbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGXu5jJRtiPNTZdA_RBUR=Xy6xcstqJUn_KoQtT4t=8jkucFQg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date:   Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:27:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJZh5AY5pTJXL2qn3=oMCvebNrx-BdQYnHtafnO6ywWWg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RANDSTRUCT structs need linux/compiler_types.h (Was: [nfsd4]
 potentially hardware breaking regression in 4.14-rc and 4.13.11)
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>,
        Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org>,
        Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
        "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" 
        <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:23 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you want me to send the patch for this, or do you already have it
>>> prepared?
>>
>> I'd rather get something explicitly tested. I tried my earlier patch
>> with "make allmodconfig" (and a fix to nfsd to make it compile), but
>> now I'm back to testing hjl's gas updates so it would be better to get
>> a tested commit with a good commit message.
>>
>>> The body-fields I had prepared for the nfs were:
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@gentoo.org>
>>> Reported-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
>>
>> Oh, I think Maciej needs to get more than a "Reported-by:". This was a
>> really subtle thing that we didn't figure out in the original thread,
>> so give him a gold star in the form of "Root-caused-by:" or something.
>
> Oops, I just sent this out. I will adjust a re-send. I couldn't find a
> documented field name for this...

With the "root-cause" hint, I see we have used:

2    Root-cause-analysis-by:
2    Root-caused-by:
1    Root-cause-found-by:

I'll go with your "Root-caused-by" to tip the scale. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security