Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp25985wrg; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:49:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225I5yV+CRTzp++FtAydE5tqykNgJglTaIMV6JgobFCd6PLXeftC5FWiAEp6VdaHvrNu+QwM X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a85:: with SMTP id w5-v6mr8084829plp.417.1519343367561; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:49:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519343367; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V8rrq3hcNneSwUKRci7CiTSU9biQiW3t9dXvs/oe7cm7Tb61U7HeO33y94yCVjJsBA 3rBX8QNT/clsBbuc25eaJWAUswPuZs1yotj2FFYSV/pRdcl7ZQq/8kDEJ1Np5FGmXGfU r2K+SUhSxR6ydlJRD8xyiQeYeELS8S84OwDidb0nKhSHROC1eGZLc5RMlbVbloMLxQnh DiTBlw8hRV4nl5KeKY5YqyNvxWVpYZJe3zr0HvXNWXqZoP10iW24FzG1tq1e5RF2sO6/ 1FsarvqR/PEJ41skU73Af9BiWYHVR2x5ZQfUGnkl7GKWmgYVjYtfmxvVOeta4RoQgx12 Yk/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=tRSxgpmrKwx7K1O05PZk4GKOIo2BQuLRlTJMAJTI9Y8=; b=WpJA144QhcwNpKjjI4l7QS9AQmd6ZkJ8I1j2NfeIKgf8iBPgj/lsZLKVTY9ayf3x50 BBRdAEuoflLeT2n6VdVatuATWtmeY2zO40EDc3zO5begC9sxr9RTSl0MjozzIttnUl+c RLjbNWsIcNhAiFjTGYYD8oLoZm30wWobmYpcW5O7HvAKxXBC4hEQcKAOGX/LIfhCW0gT a/7mX3IFKsGgjH7uSj1OPCNebMBMoWlwkaPwQ5Q7tX+xAWV2rslH2G27iTUw9Yt0WXHh sLBnETnh5iB1q0iN4j9u40f5aVIiVVPrRUdFmHCgPmtxQguCbf74QwMSHbgggt8cFnRf NJIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p6si654098pgu.560.2018.02.22.15.49.11; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:49:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751904AbeBVXsB (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:48:01 -0500 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([104.237.132.123]:43462 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750916AbeBVXr7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:47:59 -0500 Received: from [10.20.204.51] (thunderhill.nvidia.com [216.228.112.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by avon.wwwdotorg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0C7A1C0A12; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:47:57 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at avon.wwwdotorg.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: fix pllu rate configuration To: Marcel Ziswiler Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Osipenko , Marcel Ziswiler , Thierry Reding , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Prashant Gaikwad , Peter De Schrijver , Jonathan Hunter , Michael Turquette , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org References: <20180222230451.15515-1-marcel@ziswiler.com> From: Stephen Warren Message-ID: <98bfea14-de25-e764-94b4-2f0dd687149a@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:47:56 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180222230451.15515-1-marcel@ziswiler.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/22/2018 04:04 PM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > Turns out latest upstream U-Boot does not configure/enable pllu which > leaves it at some default rate of 500 kHz: I assume this is only because U-Boot just happened not to access any USB devices. In other words, if you break into the U-Boot boot flow and explicitly initialize/access USB, then USB works both in U-Boot and in the kernel even without this patch? If that's not the case, it seems there's a bug in U-Boot. Either way, I have no issue with this patch. I just want to make sure there weren't other bugs in U-Boot that needed fixing.