Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp110467wrg; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:45:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226/y94tp4GMc6SHlkNnDf08xvO4k5+zFNCS+Tad2YwZsIDnH3U+tQ5hRmM3kLCbiWDeqd9i X-Received: by 10.98.71.217 with SMTP id p86mr14906pfi.81.1519350354548; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:45:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519350354; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qL0hRs+UZ+Rs43v4KQ4dq8mpJvu9hSZBmGmm+wO0L4lee7agarkJjNA3NZJ6rTEDTh Mrw5EclsBXs8hz+XEDYmaW4hzPEC5BaoLo+/kMC6cvUF+TIG40YFMm1uvjLSl5ZJjZi7 JlYwNko9FSwfdTRMnHSt7vu+a/dJR6KxYdzQw+ePI6kj0Nbdo4dRrliTLfMKzMuAU8HT 8tOer+s9QVWBoJ6Gn09BsFC/J4T+spct4uo6AZOvWe7MR5Yd7ZZxbjUpDNU2vaYQlKHc Yr8Np3G2Rdba2nww6q1FYwWdtgUOj+DDcqM0+DC2T3ts5gJ+hS1dsUqBEZ4W591efHfW a+sw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-language :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:arc-authentication-results; bh=eeWTjxlwUTe6bBWhDsGU2uQOFdIdDfcwZhdT13bL9Tk=; b=dO6rxv9dW+OPNG7hQxMsgu5j5l5+fb3y816MVfDqMZvF3ni/rEq18jIwVW9Uo612bq j9jQlLS/2ScM8N4ztSwqkFBo4sWAWpANl+mByblnLKwgN60PHKB7TobNfVmUxN7wJbMM qfHXjsj1itx+Z1dXhGQaB+1SQXJxjfokjhTPx0w6qPS/MifOruz5+yjElQPhUQXy3Ttj hE2ROGZZRyAv3oryb1GuM6OM+VjH6/zDwh7PHEn5BA+Hz2p/+bZ9swUR86UETfGF1DBw eccPsALxD84N5pRrANrKlJ/8Yy1ncFWRkg2lWbE5ofFT7PMKJ+rtnwZkzIOizqK+d+d0 uOQA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c17-v6si919037plo.118.2018.02.22.17.45.39; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 17:45:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751350AbeBWBpA (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:45:00 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:30216 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750916AbeBWBpA (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:45:00 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Feb 2018 17:44:59 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,381,1515484800"; d="scan'208";a="206287905" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.239.197.85]) ([10.239.197.85]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2018 17:44:58 -0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update ASPEED entry with details To: Andrew Jeffery , Joel Stanley , Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20180222050324.21531-1-joel@jms.id.au> <1519288786.101739.1279390200.1CD3EC51@webmail.messagingengine.com> <23b668f1-ab4b-7ef3-ba1e-f252fbba4d1b@linux.intel.com> <1519344667.1024159.1280347184.36AD3FEC@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: "Wang, Haiyue" Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:44:58 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1519344667.1024159.1280347184.36AD3FEC@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018-02-23 08:11, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > Hi Haiyue, > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018, at 19:20, Wang, Haiyue wrote: >> Dear Andrew & Joel, >> >> Since you are ASPEED BMC experts, any time and interest in eSPI code >> review ? I've sent >> >> it before, but no more response. Intel recommends eSPI bus than LPC as I >> know. I just kept >> >> the minimal eSPI code which is approved to work well in our real server >> boards for two more >> >> years. Other part of eSPI driver from ASPEED's SDK  has been removed, >> because ePSI is a new >> >> thing, we only use a small feature set like booting host. >> >> We Intel submit this eSPI patch for openbmc upstreaming, hope for your >> response. :-) >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10166577/ >> > There are some comments against the v1 that you linked to above, is there a v2 on the lists? A long holiday back, will send v2 patch soon. > Separately it's better to ping us by replying to the patch itself and putting us in To/Cc, that way we keep discussions focused on the patch at hand here. Got it. Thanks for your reply. > > Cheers, > > Andrew