Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3Y2b-DivYz1ZqhFGUqQaiF=5SDB6RFLtCknwY2--09OQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK8P3a2-6YwRR3j7J78fVHSvDpq8Kf4wRj6d9mnGgAxgkYypxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180222234833.GA3047@roeck-us.net> <CAK8P3a3Y2b-DivYz1ZqhFGUqQaiF=5SDB6RFLtCknwY2--09OQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:09:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75Ve5b+pV78xU0DHi9644GT11gwe6sqzqrj_4xRjHHM5yRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Removing architectures without upstream gcc support
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
        linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com>,
        Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>,
        Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
        openrisc@lists.librecores.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> some of the even older architectures (parisc, alpha, m68k, ia64)
> that people maintain mainly for fun.

alpha is not only for fun but for seeing how out of order can screw up
the "working" code.

ia64 as far as I *heard* from some news will be in support (I mean by
vendors) for few more years. Not a fun, just business.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko