Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:41:05 +0000
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20180223010545.GC15876@fieldses.org>
References: <20180222151723.7d381e77@canb.auug.org.au> <12138EE4-77CA-480F-B2F9-B4C7E4E20891@ettle.org.uk> <20180223010545.GC15876@fieldses.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the nfsd tree
To:     "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
CC:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From:   James Ettle <james@ettle.org.uk>
Message-ID: <440587E4-661C-4E73-A954-8329593DAE4F@ettle.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello,

I'm OK with that. (This is the first time I've ventured into kernel space so I thought it better to at least sketch a solution and let the experts do it correctly ;) Glad it's passed the review!)

Thanks,
James.

On 23 February 2018 01:05:45 GMT+00:00, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:39:43AM +0000, James Ettle wrote:
>> I only really posted this as a demo of a fix. I was hoping someone
>who actually knows what they're doing in the kernel would pick it up
>and make it proper.
>
>Whoops, sorry, I didn't realize that.
>
>But I don't see a problem with the patch as it is.  Are you OK with me
>adding your signed-off-by?
>
>--b.
>
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> James.
>> 
>> 
>> On 22 February 2018 04:17:23 GMT+00:00, Stephen Rothwell
><sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >Commit
>> >
>> >  35da1ba8af70 ("sunrpc: Fix unaligned access on sparc64")
>> >
>> >is missing a Signed-off-by from its author.
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >Cheers,
>> >Stephen Rothwell