Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp897281wrg; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:29:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226GLyTeMCR9/9kN/sPNVicdPNB2hEMP+fIt0fVNGCg7yZbXbu4vgzjU7fgN95KgYRTgyE9c X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7c92:: with SMTP id y18-v6mr2243884pll.58.1519403348022; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:29:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519403347; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yWlqgra7xXUbDmEMIjdatcdx/zNrd4n5XXRMAT8zCOLOocigLJSi/42luL5Tqlv/K5 twpXqsGp/sU4Rp8QVR7VMSVNPYjD/6NfA3Bpu0J5OXb8q+F+BN6GhzfxQsUljQuiE4K8 TkiOrzJTYjf7UqvZQQifwZ2Hcih/YYsuZtCjIaHM2x1ssiuhwDaNKTpSTWEY649gS4eB Tj7NyOY4JTXgcoRKgOG9Fg5v6gQ9tu6xFsv+iVRpSwZknN9qp6UWbXuqiDK/f5FDpy/K Vetl3FW9xuDNqihUlHZJvCIkm2diSPe+rG1jKSCiWMScMAAb1xbiHA3Bc682iCilKruh JBjA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:arc-authentication-results; bh=CHQWYzVGUcEK5mSTe/zbPq7Vjs+mNp9WK//3Yo7R1Xc=; b=0ZIrTcQyWEHpYuQqAchPw5DTdjWPCvGQFtfVXpaQsQgbV+Qkj4ada26zCr4KTJU+AV FMFD89oetgOQxc7sv/kDpNuJRPHYB0AJDS6BBiTNDPi6tegCSR6SfeoabD9qLyFXmRDw hjyTiczy9TWeLo9rd3M5Leg+tGNN/UuUEbkeOYliRyKTsEAqo/0VVuMrO+4+0OgGNM65 +BRF+Q3t+c5x1HiLRdzF+L5FdWXtEIsE8NXahAvGamE7XonC0EqwRsQAc63+GHlQvSX4 8A7hZm08YCLjdiFxdgfAZFUxd/HJ8IG2zVK9HkMfZtIT7WKuEynstDAtA3zlOiGsQco/ ZOmw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7-v6si1990474pll.775.2018.02.23.08.28.53; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:29:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751953AbeBWQY3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:24:29 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:57330 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751841AbeBWQY0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:24:26 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DB51610; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:24:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [10.1.210.28]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7D6F73F25C; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 08:24:24 -0800 (PST) From: Sudeep Holla To: ALKML , LKML , DTML Cc: Sudeep Holla , Alexey Klimov , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: [PATCH v6 11/20] firmware: arm_scmi: add support for polling based SCMI transfers Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:23:41 +0000 Message-Id: <1519403030-21189-12-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1519403030-21189-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <1519403030-21189-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It would be useful to have options to perform some SCMI transfers atomically by polling for the completion flag instead of interrupt driven. The SCMI specification has option to disable the interrupt and poll for the completion flag in the shared memory. This patch adds support for polling based SCMI transfers using that option. This might be used for uninterrupted/atomic DVFS operations from the scheduler context. Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c index 970c3a8c6e96..e6698629e15a 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c @@ -29,10 +29,12 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -346,6 +348,30 @@ void scmi_one_xfer_put(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&minfo->xfer_lock, flags); } +static bool +scmi_xfer_poll_done(const struct scmi_info *info, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) +{ + struct scmi_shared_mem *mem = info->tx_payload; + u16 xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(le32_to_cpu(mem->msg_header)); + + if (xfer->hdr.seq != xfer_id) + return false; + + return le32_to_cpu(mem->channel_status) & + (SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_ERROR | + SCMI_SHMEM_CHAN_STAT_CHANNEL_FREE); +} + +#define SCMI_MAX_POLL_TO_NS (100 * NSEC_PER_USEC) + +static bool scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(const struct scmi_info *info, + struct scmi_xfer *xfer, ktime_t stop) +{ + ktime_t __cur = ktime_get(); + + return scmi_xfer_poll_done(info, xfer) || ktime_after(__cur, stop); +} + /** * scmi_do_xfer() - Do one transfer * @@ -372,15 +398,28 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer) /* mbox_send_message returns non-negative value on success, so reset */ ret = 0; - /* And we wait for the response. */ - timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(info->desc->max_rx_timeout_ms); - if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&xfer->done, timeout)) { - dev_err(dev, "mbox timed out in resp(caller: %pS)\n", - (void *)_RET_IP_); - ret = -ETIMEDOUT; - } else if (xfer->hdr.status) { - ret = scmi_to_linux_errno(xfer->hdr.status); + if (xfer->hdr.poll_completion) { + ktime_t stop = ktime_add_ns(ktime_get(), SCMI_MAX_POLL_TO_NS); + + spin_until_cond(scmi_xfer_done_no_timeout(info, xfer, stop)); + + if (ktime_before(ktime_get(), stop)) + scmi_fetch_response(xfer, info->tx_payload); + else + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + } else { + /* And we wait for the response. */ + timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(info->desc->max_rx_timeout_ms); + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&xfer->done, timeout)) { + dev_err(dev, "mbox timed out in resp(caller: %pS)\n", + (void *)_RET_IP_); + ret = -ETIMEDOUT; + } } + + if (!ret && xfer->hdr.status) + ret = scmi_to_linux_errno(xfer->hdr.status); + /* * NOTE: we might prefer not to need the mailbox ticker to manage the * transfer queueing since the protocol layer queues things by itself. -- 2.7.4