Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp1040596wrg; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:50:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227yu8qJK9VuOvWhAf9YMl+Bo58y1OaGHGZPZ5/LABmUM3r0aQ6CNVy9k9fs4lp0uNfB8TQw X-Received: by 10.99.111.137 with SMTP id k131mr2176364pgc.11.1519411811062; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:50:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519411811; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BIkpula88QqtkBezz5IEkXjk3ZNTCb4vGl4NbhHuWlTmtwkZx2igCir9eZ2BNrQTdm 1x5DOfeiE7T7c7P2FPUzp1iuhKBmMtMa0jF8xMkT4+zaEOl0LJyz+EneFXDuJdYjsJnA gXJoUQS4RnTBPBDJZZQwnX7B+wLpKlVbE59e12s2v+YAG+zsYgCse/jf6xe7EDl0kyWG 2iFQqlQHRi72rT7Xm6VhiXxga52Dyp2YQ+G2ynDI3pdu9dqih7DsjUhylHm1IVewa+m5 cT3wdqXXDO8+5+7rOSkLyy7H7ZDj3IQQRnehXSQxILBYbfk2cR4mr9U+wusUhE3/MDel s2PQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :arc-authentication-results; bh=rulrJfhth68c+Gja/rZGjzjEV7PhRO0lNp9YoijfQJU=; b=g6c12uthfL8GnnQ51vCT55OniMa/njdf7OtCR77mCXfA07Q/GBVsFRvYYGTn/MqOK+ XPX42t+f1Ez84WBXR3UbuLuL4+qGFduoTXg/UqpTLjzlqzksYcYthKC1iaJKYDE9jJHi Xyrgnvx1JeTpHnKoOqykxcuWQOlbrsRCgdK7+I3124M62kkNecmKfEr8ovjofnQpZtcs EKWmh4d3xRYc6SVEB1K3BjYAGYXMoOq0syKHk9JRIVxsyjMTLKjvxQsLsFNibFqhjdBP smBZ09iulCA//lyP2n+K6AjgioGAsne/UMWn7nLczz3Fv4Zfo1qO0wv85DcbQuPq18dv A/aA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 63-v6si2149429pla.526.2018.02.23.10.49.56; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:50:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934459AbeBWSsq (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:48:46 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45012 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933827AbeBWSsm (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2018 13:48:42 -0500 Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12258-90.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.71.90]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04B2B10ED; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:48:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Borislav Petkov , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Arnd Bergmann Subject: [PATCH 4.9 141/145] x86/microcode/AMD: Change load_microcode_amd()s param to bool to fix preemptibility bug Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 19:27:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20180223170742.924579868@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.16.2 In-Reply-To: <20180223170724.669759283@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20180223170724.669759283@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Borislav Petkov commit dac6ca243c4c49a9ca7507d3d66140ebfac8b04b upstream. With CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled, I get: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 caller is debug_smp_processor_id CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.12.0-rc2+ #2 Call Trace: dump_stack check_preemption_disabled debug_smp_processor_id save_microcode_in_initrd_amd ? microcode_init save_microcode_in_initrd ... because, well, it says it above, we're using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code. But passing the CPU number is not really needed. It is only used to determine whether we're on the BSP, and, if so, to save the microcode patch for early loading. [ We don't absolutely need to do it on the BSP but we do that customarily there. ] Instead, convert that function parameter to a boolean which denotes whether the patch should be saved or not, thereby avoiding the use of smp_processor_id() in preemptible code. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170528200414.31305-1-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar [arnd: rebased to 4.9, after running into warning: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:881:30: self-comparison always evaluates to true] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h | 1 - arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 17 +++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ static inline u16 find_equiv_id(struct e extern int __apply_microcode_amd(struct microcode_amd *mc_amd); extern int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu); -extern enum ucode_state load_microcode_amd(int cpu, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size); #define PATCH_MAX_SIZE PAGE_SIZE --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static size_t compute_container_size(u8 return size; } +static enum ucode_state +load_microcode_amd(bool save, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size); + /* * Early load occurs before we can vmalloc(). So we look for the microcode * patch container file in initrd, traverse equivalent cpu table, look for a @@ -451,7 +454,7 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd( eax = cpuid_eax(0x00000001); eax = ((eax >> 8) & 0xf) + ((eax >> 20) & 0xff); - ret = load_microcode_amd(smp_processor_id(), eax, container, container_size); + ret = load_microcode_amd(true, eax, container, container_size); if (ret != UCODE_OK) retval = -EINVAL; @@ -864,7 +867,8 @@ static enum ucode_state __load_microcode return UCODE_OK; } -enum ucode_state load_microcode_amd(int cpu, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size) +static enum ucode_state +load_microcode_amd(bool save, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size) { enum ucode_state ret; @@ -878,8 +882,8 @@ enum ucode_state load_microcode_amd(int #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 /* save BSP's matching patch for early load */ - if (cpu_data(cpu).cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index) { - struct ucode_patch *p = find_patch(cpu); + if (save) { + struct ucode_patch *p = find_patch(0); if (p) { memset(amd_ucode_patch, 0, PATCH_MAX_SIZE); memcpy(amd_ucode_patch, p->data, min_t(u32, ksize(p->data), @@ -911,11 +915,12 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcod { char fw_name[36] = "amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin"; struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); + bool bsp = c->cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index; enum ucode_state ret = UCODE_NFOUND; const struct firmware *fw; /* reload ucode container only on the boot cpu */ - if (!refresh_fw || c->cpu_index != boot_cpu_data.cpu_index) + if (!refresh_fw || !bsp) return UCODE_OK; if (c->x86 >= 0x15) @@ -932,7 +937,7 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcod goto fw_release; } - ret = load_microcode_amd(cpu, c->x86, fw->data, fw->size); + ret = load_microcode_amd(bsp, c->x86, fw->data, fw->size); fw_release: release_firmware(fw);