Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270524AbTHDIKj (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 04:10:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271357AbTHDIKj (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 04:10:39 -0400 Received: from mx0.gmx.de ([213.165.64.100]:40092 "HELO mx0.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S270524AbTHDIKf (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 04:10:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:10:34 +0200 (MEST) From: Daniel Blueman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-t1 sis900 timeout X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated-Sender: #0008973862@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [194.202.174.101] Message-ID: <8723.1059984634@www20.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 924 Lines: 24 Can you check if the IRQ allocated to the SiS900 is the same on kernels where it does work, and try without ACPI support, and/or any IO-APIC support disabled? I've seen this before with the network card in one of my systems - the IO-APIC setup code, or ACPI table parsing was misprogramming the IRQ routing tables, and it was being allocated the wrong level-triggered IRQ line. Dan -- Daniel J Blueman COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test -------------------------------------------------- 1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger! 2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualit?tssieger! 3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8. e-Post - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/