Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp2643173wrg; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 02:46:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2273MoJCNPIhUd50Egwdm9hc45O+PtULmfjhjGjMe9vKKkNeY3axqOT4it93rEku3TDNCxwW X-Received: by 10.99.116.70 with SMTP id e6mr5765690pgn.256.1519555608383; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 02:46:48 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519555608; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zX/A15l+DutrozFXlK1OoyaJKDrB4FdYGvz814xXO6MERsLOoqjdbpHb+QJeQdnKf1 pcoMquGMAZNXU87I5K+mM6NJGqVAfzOJxXit4ju3l+yEclurvODT0uvlTX6gDoF3wM9q 7c8QRqTW06JIGodt1nA5SFbSMWnNqm+noCkfMUhxJEITVmFqtOU6nEc+nGEWvS+QYpNq IfL1PUSGtaVLMsnxexLFFr2R2db9DemcT5Yozn2PoeW+vIiX+9xypjPbfOIW4SvBq3wo CW9CIrtkemiHGex1D5TXTU2atxNfhJlyE847+RtizL8ahvkJ2Muz8kWUq7Vr1VJhR1RD vedw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:dkim-signature :arc-authentication-results; bh=o6AgbU5Bw6fVSo7l2ERhrvIQwC/gLH33pY+5rc244Mw=; b=Fr0RJQbjz1CP9fCYP+q3+8N8cqFb/6jXh2+EXpFZtYDN1QOrHMDtgd7CgqfjDAL19k N7b0tlMKbG6ArSargJbPuT8S9ogPJSCW3+6yN+ZttWwy1peVpQ3pF3GeT4UjII+ERSq7 pd0WamgyFJo8RPIiBuVbP947O8bFJvVit9huLxcLRTjYPFLZkxuVyXHw+a4qfiwmrDAg fn9u8IVV53E+HhmipO3NgSbbWThhJuvg3IecpaPE/sF4yHkk29wwbpeDpprlOMjnIt2N YZog9NWqdsPSrV84N7mhyEoxxzpTPEJk3zQW21Ivm1dJ7us60Jg0gb0rQhMjc2FqJS8r m0TQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HYqxWBFO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n10-v6si5018514pls.112.2018.02.25.02.46.32; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 02:46:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HYqxWBFO; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751576AbeBYKpy (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 25 Feb 2018 05:45:54 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com ([209.85.128.171]:46338 "EHLO mail-wr0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987AbeBYKpx (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2018 05:45:53 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id m12so494954wrm.13 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 02:45:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=o6AgbU5Bw6fVSo7l2ERhrvIQwC/gLH33pY+5rc244Mw=; b=HYqxWBFOJGYYeDxRRN5EjhualuuJpv+sANic3f1e+DAw7+0//fK6wYOucBNzR3Ddwk Tn1CfewiavYK7N5QoUtYFm0TuMCcpMfzhN5bxd+71bUqOtj7v1QH6UtwDc6jKnzl9xih PqOTX+/HDO7U30qi5PlLLPPTPY0+/uqyH6F4erHi3Pedqj2bDiMMY5QkTGljn2XvgJC6 ZJvYQVKdENOqlar8rSFG2Wyb2NIBtK7zyMk6t7AZehPwz4T1RLF6wRfrwlreHQlNj5Ne /K4f7o70mKwpvpVvt927eDr3exFogmg4Li5PphFthuJIpQTERqqw8BsLJzb45HeFYVZW BKHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o6AgbU5Bw6fVSo7l2ERhrvIQwC/gLH33pY+5rc244Mw=; b=XP3+Vwk7JQ8sKznZSMQadpwywe6TASeW2J6q0Oj1rRbVPHBFaoCT5Xn8Mz7iCIDyIz 0LbOMa6u6kLjHYQuEJC5MHQdpQSIp8cHo7iwG9wfRA+RY+OIuaqZsF2BGS6WyaFgk1i1 x38TQaQIA0UYbn/hYkZ0/L+nytV/knOcTiVdxJa/tzceN6gDo3jaYK2Odv6mMYFdl6Bu Fg5BLA9IjO5jfTxf4LQQGiXzP3ZMvPIDY4ajoyWek43RWDrvTjFplFz49goMb2f9hFw9 WVuvk4yRiMV6vrhzxdGGucE3w5Gmm4kmAy/x/ARIiW1joE+fnsF+6qBfizH3UtHwxwPm qtUg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPA9QUrPUQI2LeMs27ZnCw17mPQblvGP73x0zbkzRpTrpwn6XccO UBwyrdluXRONjNkN63Beodgs7/pqSZqZaCTlzaY= X-Received: by 10.223.200.144 with SMTP id k16mr6876329wrh.282.1519555552164; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 02:45:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.197.71 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 02:45:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Marius Cirsta Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 12:45:51 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Logitech webcam USB audio breakage during the 4.10 merge window To: Takashi Iwai Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gabriel C , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Thanks for your answer. Yes, I tried reverting just that commit on top of kernel 4.15.5 and there was no change so I too suspect it's something from USB core related to the quirks that this webcam needs. Regards, Marius Cirsta, mforce2@gmail.com On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 02:53:15 +0100, > Marius Cirsta wrote: >> >> I have a problem that was previously reported here: >> >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg156999.html >> >> It seems that with the 4.10-rc1 kernel a regression was introduced >> that makes my Logitech C310 microphone record a distorted ( chipmunk ) >> sound. With the 4.9.1 kernel it works perfectly. >> >> Immediately after I plug it into the USB port all is fine but after a >> few minutes this problem occurs. >> >> Also if add this the kernel cmd line : usbcore.autosuspend=-1 it >> also works fine. >> >> One other thing that I've noticed is that if I make the sampling rate >> 22K it again works fine so only the 44K and 48K sampling rates have >> this problem but unfortunately those are the default that Chromium for >> instance uses ( it gets them from pulseaudio ) >> >> >> Let me know if you need any more details or testing. > > Well it's an old topic, so I don't remember, but did you try to revert > the commit fd1a5059610c as already suggested? > > If it doesn't give any difference, it's not about USB-audio driver > side, rather likely some change in USB core. > > > Takashi