Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271707AbTHDMPv (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:15:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271710AbTHDMPv (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:15:51 -0400 Received: from mail3.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.7]:43185 "HELO heather-ng.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S271707AbTHDMPu (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:15:50 -0400 X-Sender-Authentification: SMTPafterPOP by from 217.64.64.14 Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:15:48 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: linux-kernel Subject: FS: hardlinks on directories Message-Id: <20030804141548.5060b9db.skraw@ithnet.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 970 Lines: 23 Hello all, although it is very likely I am entering (again :-) an ancient discussion I would like to ask why hardlinks on directories are not allowed/no supported fs action these days. I can't think of a good reason for this, but can think of many good reasons why one would like to have such a function, amongst those: - restructuring of the fs to meet different sorting criterias (kind of a database view onto the fs) - relinking of the fs for export to other hosts via nfs or the like (enhanced security through artificially constructed, exported trees) Would a feature like that be seen as "big action" or rather small enhancement to the fs-layer? Are there any supporters for this feature out there? Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/