Received: by 10.223.185.116 with SMTP id b49csp2832652wrg; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:21:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224f2v3+jzkP9k3s4G7Y/eInSfwn0EhKwFRnrGOCp21aJHDuQkZweW3qCjYUtoymis1SitKU X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:424:: with SMTP id 33-v6mr7662784ple.57.1519572085112; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:21:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1519572085; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Wy7niJ3LlzCvz2gF2phiKS+5FrEOlmWrCpmsICoLqJ4M/ZTw41G3ZjelHxX3YV6AGq lf0QgzIg70vIlcB0fvRKiN4CNUTNjIlHkftYICBFASwWhmulxHqVGz/sZ1CmuueURnyK 1Hz9q8fGFf3JTf7JHpZdlUjVL1n4OFsPoRgDwnzYPrgUs5Pn8VZjFYNHcnB3TNKEjSll GlI+BMZJkKr3g5Md5oMHTmhuhF3D+LlQH/9RvFlifxpnXJEiCffiZQHcuGu5XyrSSoVw WPZSyTtWHZ/NHTyLenslmGf21INR0wcSxxXGFBc2/h+QLD/cRVRAsrlsY5DJLsIce9o9 VSqQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date:arc-authentication-results; bh=yzKXgyOP9IBKtJBw+cgIomofB9STsFzgiyjf2roUnxA=; b=Y8ttUtu2+zuPkBELoeAJtPCEo3zUUv+YaB3jyWSdrcHqVt6yDqxxYBJMQlpPCpz37t uJ+fJOwLaaI1gmGgjo52Hd2qHQ4KMD9jTwMbpqc/wfi3hiFufnR3RmzOufkW1J5RSBG6 fH6jP8P3ACUdMFiEziRFDP2Z+cSpVZEfFFn8vksgYba/xY3ORQDXCBrdvO7Zv0T5QRuJ Rvdx9e6Av6AruhBZvtOH2IhmNcgKVl0bqdGNpjMc7dkJtGwPNWRg0BlGb0v0ZCZyw63l uWLrnsDw8TaKllj1YygOz9wsiyO7yUeXN+OSjZbdTaUSsGojSpe6TPI2NNE4HER4Oxbp UOFA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f2-v6si5211745plo.140.2018.02.25.07.21.10; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 07:21:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751833AbeBYPTI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 25 Feb 2018 10:19:08 -0500 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:56840 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751717AbeBYPTG (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Feb 2018 10:19:06 -0500 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 03B2F206A0; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:19:04 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.free-electrons.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from dell-desktop.home (vol75-h03-176-137-37-244.dsl.sta.abo.bbox.fr [176.137.37.244]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C891220371; Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:19:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 16:19:01 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TXlsw6huZQ==?= Josserand To: Maxime Ripard Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, wens@csie.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, quentin.schulz@bootlin.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] ARM: sun9i: smp: Add sun9i dt parsing function Message-ID: <20180225161901.207b69fe@dell-desktop.home> In-Reply-To: <20180223145423.5og5bdhtznu5qlw7@flea.lan> References: <20180223133742.26044-1-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> <20180223133742.26044-2-mylene.josserand@bootlin.com> <20180223145423.5og5bdhtznu5qlw7@flea.lan> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:54:23 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 02:37:33PM +0100, Mylène Josserand wrote: > > To prepare the support for sun8i-a83t, create a new function > > that handles all the resources needed on sun9i-a80 (because > > it will be different from sun8i-a83t). > > > > All the parsing of device tree is moved into this new function: > > sun9i_dt_parsing. Create also a function to release the resources > > retrieved during the dt parsing in case there is an error in init > > function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mylène Josserand > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c > > index 11e46c6efb90..650a2ad4398f 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/mc_smp.c > > @@ -684,35 +684,22 @@ static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_lookback(void) > > return ret; > > } > > > > -static int __init sunxi_mc_smp_init(void) > > +static int sun9i_dt_parsing(struct resource res) > > Like I told you in the previous version, this should be _parse_dt, and > not _dt_parsing. Sorry, I forgot this review. > > Also, I'm not sure why you are passing by copy the resource structure? > > > { > > - struct device_node *cpucfg_node, *sram_node, *node; > > - struct resource res; > > + struct device_node *prcm_node, *cpucfg_node, *sram_node; > > int ret; > > > > - if (!of_machine_is_compatible("allwinner,sun9i-a80")) > > - return -ENODEV; > > - > > - if (!sunxi_mc_smp_cpu_table_init()) > > - return -EINVAL; > > - > > - if (!cci_probed()) { > > - pr_err("%s: CCI-400 not available\n", __func__); > > - return -ENODEV; > > - } > > - > > - node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "allwinner,sun9i-a80-prcm"); > > - if (!node) { > > - pr_err("%s: PRCM not available\n", __func__); > > + prcm_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, > > + "allwinner,sun9i-a80-prcm"); > > + if (!prcm_node) > > return -ENODEV; > > - } > > > > /* > > * Unfortunately we can not request the I/O region for the PRCM. > > * It is shared with the PRCM clock. > > */ > > - prcm_base = of_iomap(node, 0); > > - of_node_put(node); > > + prcm_base = of_iomap(prcm_node, 0); > > So it does more a bit more than just parsing the DT? > > Can you maybe just fill the DT nodes and have the common part map the > memory regions if the pointer is not NULL? Yep, I will rework this function to only parse device tree nodes. Thanks, Mylène -- Mylène Josserand, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://bootlin.com