Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S271738AbTHDOPH (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:15:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S271741AbTHDOPH (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:15:07 -0400 Received: from natsmtp01.webmailer.de ([192.67.198.81]:20722 "EHLO post.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S271738AbTHDOPE (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:15:04 -0400 Message-ID: <3F2E6A86.3060402@softhome.net> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 16:15:34 +0200 From: "Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030701 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesse Pollard CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: TOE brain dump References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 827 Lines: 28 Jesse Pollard wrote: >>3k of code. >>not 650k of bzip. > > And it handles ipfilter? > and LSM security hooks? > how about IPSec? > and IPv6? > > I don't think so. Answer is "No". I'm running expensive workstation - and I'm _NOT_ using LSM/IPSec/IPv6. I do not care what I _*can*_ do - I care about what I _*need*_ to do. Point is here that 3k of code is all what we need. Not 'what every one does need', not Linux kernel. P.S. printk() is absolutely renundant since there is no display at all ;-) And can you imagine Linux without printk, bug_on & panic?-))) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/