Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87mv004p0t.fsf@xmission.com>
References: <878tbmf5vl.fsf@xmission.com> <20180221202908.17258-4-ebiederm@xmission.com>
 <CAOssrKeNLBeMkMrrCeRBO9Z80zFxCCEygKL3DErnQ9xBoLkH0g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87inao6dfa.fsf@xmission.com> <87mv004p0t.fsf@xmission.com>
From:   Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:47:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOssrKd+c0Mx+=S-+zr1QS8a37Pm=VGki=FVR+LXQZBsk3byqA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] fuse: Ensure posix acls are translated outside of init_user_ns
To:     "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Alban Crequy <alban@kinvolk.io>,
        Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
        Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
        Dongsu Park <dongsu@kinvolk.io>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 11:50 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:

> So if we could figure out how to use the generic acl support for the old
> brand of fuse filesystems that don't set FUSE_POSIX_ACL it would be much
> easier to support them long term.

Simplest and most robust way seems to be to do everything the same (as
with FUSE_POSIX_ACL) but tell the vfs not to cache the acl.

Thanks,
Miklos